My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6587
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6587
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:10 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:54:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6587
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. P-77-20 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/29/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />by all but one of the lots involved. Again, it was for the <br />bituminous paving, seven-ton roadway as in the other cases, <br />32 feet wide with the same kind of curb and gutter. There <br />are some - what I would call - unique circumstances in this <br />that didn't exist in the other roadways. This sketch shows <br />how Oxford now has been widened a little bit at the time <br />Shryer was done. It then narrows down to half of a roadway <br />width of 15 to 16 feet wide in front of this lot which is <br />undeveloped and, in fact, we don't have the north half of <br />the right-of-way for that portion. It then jogs a little <br />westerly and is about 26 feet wide in this location. There <br />are some storm drainage facilities in the area. If this <br />improvement were done, those would be realigned and relocated. <br />There is also a rather large mound of earth - part of which <br />was removed last fall, but much of it still remains. This <br />would also be moved and knocked down to standard elevations <br />if the improvement were done. As in the other improvements, <br />no trees on the existing property are anticipated to be <br />affected, and no shrubbery, and only minor adjustments to <br />driveway grades. Perhaps we can see the other sketch. This <br />shows pictorially what would be done, with the green being <br />the curb and gutter, and the brown the paving. The other <br />aspect of this improvement - if you recall that lot that did <br />not have the full frontage - this lot also does not have any <br />utility facilities. There is an existing sanitary sewer, but <br />no watermain. For this lot to be developed, it will be neces- <br />sary to construct a watermain between Shryer and north of <br />Ryan where (inaudible) the watermain does exist in this loca- <br />tion, some sewer services would have to be constructed to <br />this lot, and water services to this let. The services would <br />only be charged to that lot, but the watermain would be asses- <br />sed to all the lots that it goes past. This is in accordance <br />with the existing city policy that there is a 25 foot assess- <br />able frontage assumed on the so-called side lot portion of <br />corner lots. The Council may wish to review that point for <br />these two homes that already have water connections at the <br />time of a special assessment procedure. At this point we <br />merely followed the standard policy. The reason being that <br />these people are hooked up and would gain no advantage from <br />the new watermain. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.