My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6588
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:10 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:54:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6588
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-77-24 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/29/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. FRED SEIFERT, 1985 North Chatsworth: I signed the <br />petition to have the Ryan Avenue improvement made, but at <br />this time I see that we should also have Oxford improved <br />too, so I think at this time we should - I'll vote against <br />it and wait until we can get more of Shryer in there or the <br />other end of Ryan going out - the north part of Ryan going <br />out - until we can get the whole street at one time. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else that wishes to be heard? <br /> <br />MR. GEORGE MOONEY, 1986 North Lexington: I would like <br />to state that I am for improving Oxford whether or not Ryan <br />Avenue is improved. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: At this point, may I ask what your <br />Alternate 3 comes to? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: These are rough numbers. The way I have <br />it roughted out, we have $17,200 of expense and approximately <br />182 assessable feet. That comes to $95 a foot, or divided <br />into the 25%, approximately $24 a foot assessments. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Then let me ask you - that $24 a foot <br />times 13 feet, that would run about a little over $300. <br />The Mooney's would be bearing the biggest - no, I guess it's <br />whether we want to get the $300 assessment against those two <br />east side lots on Oxford. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: See you're looking at figures, would <br />you take the difference between - was it $11 and - for the <br />Oxford proposal and subtracting (inaudible). <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: It's $3 and something. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: Take the difference and multiply <br />by 75 feet front footage comes out to about $300 and lid <br />say that an extra $300 I'd be paying for my lot to improve <br />that short length of Oxford, and the people on Oxford aren't <br />even paying that much. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.