My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6622
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6600
>
res_6622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:14 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:55:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6622
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-ST-P-77-27, Including Alternate 3A, Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/20/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of Transit Avenue. That, plus the fact that the existing road- <br />way is in very poor condition, is very narrow, quite flat in <br />grades, and poorly drained, has substandard base material which <br />needs to be replaced, and will in all likelihood, as this con- <br />struction takes place, be in q~ite a state of turmoil and under <br />considerable stress due to the construction itself, namely, the <br />heavy equipment going down it, the construction vehicles <br />bringing materials to the site, and even when the homes are <br />done, the moving vans coming to and fro. There's going to be <br />considerable stress on this area of Transit. <br /> <br />Because of these reasons, the staff has recommended that <br />it be considered at this time that Transit Avenue be brought up <br />to a permanent roadway condition. To do this, we have looked <br />at two different ways that it might occur. The first is that <br />from Galtier Street to the edge of the commercially zoned <br />property near Rice, a typical 32 foot wide, 7 ton design con- <br />crete curb and gutter roadway be placed. This is identical to <br />what is proposed on the cul-de-sacs, and what exists on Ga1tier <br />Circle, and actually what exists down Transit for the remainder <br />of the way. Approximately 300 feet - it is proposed to be <br />somewhat thicker in design, namely a 9 ton design limit. The <br />reason for this is it's currently unknown just what will happen <br />in these two commercially zoned areas. It's likely there will <br />be driveways in and out somewhere in this area, and also likely <br />that whatever entry points are necessary to serve these com- <br />mercial activities and the trucks to supply supplies to them <br />will be in this easterly 300 feet. If we really knew for sure <br />what was going to be there I might say it's not necessary to <br />build this to a 9 ton limit, or I might say it's very important. <br />This is simply a precautionary measure so we have what is <br />Alternate 3 which means all of the things we talked of before - <br />the utilities, the watermains, paving, plus building Transit <br />at 7 ton up to about 300 feet from Rice and 9 ton for the <br />remainder. We have what is called Alternate 3A - same set of <br />everything except this time Transit Street is entirely a 7 ton <br />roadway. Once again, however, when we talk of Alternate 3A it <br />does include the other utilities and paving projects. <br /> <br />One thing that you should know, although Mr. Popovich will <br />be bringing you several figures and statistics, the city special <br />assessing policy for these kinds of roadways calls for the side <br />lots to be assessed at only 10% of their length. An example <br />would be this lot. This lot is lonqer on this side than it is <br />this way, and we didn't show the back lot line, but this is <br />the longest distance. The city code says that regardless of <br />which way the house faces, where the garage is, or anything <br />else, the front shall be whatever the shortest side is on a <br />corner lot. The side lot shall be whatever the lonqest side <br />is. In this case, this is the longer side so it would be <br />assessed only 10% of that distance times the assessment rate. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.