res_6663 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

south side of the roac1. The lr.ltter choice is the recommendation of the engineering department. StorM se\nTers t'7ould be builtin anticipation at this point - of the diversion taking place from Rice Creek, anc1 the sanitary sewer and watermains would be constructed along these new roadways where ti~ey do not exist. TiAYOR DE I'iO S ~ r'lr. Popovich, ",ill you give us the financial aspects. r1R. POPOVICH ~ Uhat ''''e have had to do in view of all the different alternates, is add up the most ex~ensive to arrive at the cost that ,.,as published. Taking the most expensive, the total cost is $222,333. It's toward the rear part of your feasibility report. On the sanitary sewer portion we propose that lOO% be assessed and that will raise $29,44B.l3 at $13.58 assessable per front foot. The sanitary sewer services, of which there would be 37, would be 100% assessed at $246 per service. On the ~7atermains, the total cost would he 100% assessed at approximately $43,000. Assessable frontage is $15.70. The water services would also he lOO% assessee, and those service lines would be $303 each. On street, curb and gutter, excluding County Road C-2, there are two alternates - Phase land 2, and those woulrt be 100% assessed. For Phase 1 the assessment would be $26.40 a front foot. On Phase 2 it would be $4l.5l a front foot. Alternate 2 on street, curb an0 gutter, excluding County Road C-2, costs $10l,OOO. There the assessment per foot ,Qou1Ct be $38.57 if you went that approach. County Road C-2, if you go for the 7-ton alternate, the total cost is $lOl,075. A portion wouln be assessed on a front foot basis and a portion would be on general taxes. The assessment on the north half tlou1d be $23.97 a front foot, and on tl1e south half it would be $10.94, an0 about $8,600 would he picked up on general taxes. If you go for Alternate B, which is the 9-ton r1SA - because of the contribution the cost is $24,000 so far as the assessments are concerned, but the assessment per front foot on the north half is $32.82 a front foot, and there would be no assessment on the south half, or deve lor,>ed side of tl1e street, but the general taxes Nou1d be $12,37l of that alter- nate. So the Council's decision, depending on the input from ti1e public, is ,,,hich alternate route do you ",ant to go and the costs will vary according to those alternates.