My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6663
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6600
>
res_6663
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:17 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:56:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6663
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-77-3 Alternate B, under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
6/12/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />any cost would be spread, at least in part, against you as a <br />home o'~er. The typical procedure on the policies of assessing <br />residential property is to charge 25% of the actual cost to the <br />abutting property o~mers. The other 75% - if it were a 7-ton <br />road - would be charged against the general public in taxes. <br /> <br />rr~. DOEGE~ That don't sound too good to me. <br /> <br />~~AYOR DEMOS: T'1ould you like to express "rhether you support <br />Alternate 2? <br /> <br />MR. BOEGE: I don't like that widening of the road. <br />There isn't too much to go if you're talking about taking two <br />or three more feet of my. property. There's going to be a big <br />drop off. <br /> <br />[m. nOi:~Cl!ELT..: It's not proposed to take any of your <br />property for the roadway. I'm not saying "re may not get a <br />construction easement to make sure that if a man steps a foot <br />doing some ~10rk (inaudible) but e1e city \'I7ou1d not end up <br />owning your property. <br /> <br />MRS. CURT BOEGE, 2874 Herri11~ T'n1Y can't we vacate that? <br />f'1e don't need that. <br /> <br />r1R. HONCHELL ~ It's our vie,'l there needs to he a collec- <br />tor roadway to carry the traffic east and west from the large <br />num.~er of homes. <br /> <br />HRS. BOEGE: Nelve lived there 25 years and. never hao. to <br />have a speedt1ay between Snelling and Lexington, so if we <br />vacated that and just have r~rrill go through ~1eod be just like <br />we are now - a nice, calm, peaceful neighborhood. <br /> <br />HR. lIONCIIELL~ If you vacated County Road C-2 - if you <br />see Lot 7 which is directly to the south at the en0 of the <br />plat - that land is unbuildahle because it has no frontage. <br /> <br />rms. BOEGE: vfuen we bought our pro~erty, then Reiling's <br />property was nine feet above our property and he has cut <br />Fernwood down - the (inaudible) of Ferm~ood and also cut 2875 <br />all the ''lay dO\'ln into a pit and he used to be 9 feet above <br />us and that's when we bought it - we thought no way would we <br />ever have to come to this. <br /> <br />fiR. HONCHELL: The road'lilay of County :qoad C-2 has been <br />part of the city's Master plan for a number of years, back <br />into the fifties; and the reason it Has r,mt on 'Nas the antici- <br />pation of collecting the traffic from those neighborhoods <br />that were envisioned an~ are now cominq into being. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.