My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6664
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6600
>
res_6664
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:17 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:56:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6664
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-78-7 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
6/12/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />On the street, curb and gutter the total cost is $28,155 and <br />to that portion of the addition on the western portion it would <br />be lOO% assessed. On the t,",o lots in the f'1est View Addition <br />the cost would be $9.73 a front foot because of the reduction <br />that was indicated by ~1r. lIonchell \-.Then he made his presentation. <br /> <br />This improvement \l1ould be spread over a 20 year period <br />of time with 3% carrying charge, with right to prepay after <br />the assessment hearing and in any year of the assessments. <br /> <br />j'.1AYOR DEIlOS ~ Any communications? <br /> <br />HR 0 NORTH ~ There are none. <br /> <br />rmYOR DErDS: I will open the hearinq to the public and <br />ask that anyone who speaks come to the microphone and give his <br />or her name and address. Anyone who wishes to be heard? <br /> <br />LOLA HISCOCK, 373 West County ~ad B~ I am one of the <br />existing houses, and the way I understand this, I would be <br />charged $9.73 a front foot, riqht? So my total cost would be <br />$1,350 - about - that's just approximate. <br /> <br />~L~. HONCHELL~ I think that's off about 10 times. If you <br />recall when I went through the discussion, since yours is <br />what it is called a side lot condition to the road that's being <br />proposed, you would only be char~ed one-tenth of the distance <br />along ~nat roadway. <br /> <br />LOLA HISCOCK: That would he l3 times $9.73. <br /> <br />r1R. HONCHELL: So you're lOOking at about $l30. 00. <br /> <br />LOLA HISCOCK~ As long as I1m up here, why do we need <br />these gutters in P.oseville? f1hy have He come to that? <br /> <br />~m. HONCHELL~ Nould you like my long answer or short one? <br /> <br />~mYOR DEtDS~ Don't make it too short if you don't tell <br />the l'lhole story. <br /> <br />HR. HONCHELL~ The prime reason for curb and gutter is to <br />carry storm water at the time of rains. The predominant thing <br />that ends up destroying roads is not the heavy traffic or <br />number of vehicles, but it's grounc. that's under the road and <br />do we keep the water out fron under the road. If we can keen <br />the water runninq in these concrete curb and crutters it stops <br />it from going along t..he edge of the roadl'1ay, going dOlm .. <br />through the soil or throuqh the cracks, qettinq under the road, <br />making it soft, and when the vehicle c1ri ves over it, it's like <br />a sponge. It (inaudible) it do~m and when itcornes up you <br />have a crack. Then the ~later goes through the cracJc and makes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.