My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6782
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6700
>
res_6782
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:11:32 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:58:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6782
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-P-78-30 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications
Resolution Date Passed
2/12/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l7 <br /> <br />The second thing is you may feel you have paid for it but we do <br />not feel because our records do not show those lots were assessed. <br />Whether or not your builder passed any costs on to you is unknown <br />to us, but the fact remains he was not assessed for those lots <br />at the time that those improvements - speaking of street, storm <br />sewer - were put in. <br /> <br />MR. MAJ~GLE: Yes, he was. He paid for those improvements <br />himself. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: But not for storm sewer in the area that we <br />show. <br /> <br />MR. MANGLE: He didn't need a storm sewer because your city <br />staff looked at it and said we don't need it. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We don't know what they said. <br /> <br />MR. MANGLE: They didn't put it in so there must have been a <br />determination that we don't need it. They made the determination. <br />It wasn't built, and I'd like to respond to one more thing. The <br />requirements that were put on Kroiss were not put on BanCon. <br />As a mat er of Bct, why aren't these lots along Dale up here - <br />because this is the crest of the hill - why aren't these lots in <br />the assessment? They're draining water down their driveways. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: First of all, if the water to the west, as Mr. <br />Honchell explained, went to the north when it was originally done <br />(inaudible) west of Dale Street, but water flowing to the east, <br />that would have meant a separate storm sewer improvement at that <br />point for just that little bit. If a determination was made <br />it probably was made not that it was not needed but too costly for <br />that small area at the time he was building. There was no way you <br />could have the people of Roseville stand still to pick up Iona Lane <br />for Ray Kroiss. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The area you indicated immediately to the south <br />and on the east side already has storm drainage that's in place. <br /> <br />MR. MANGLE: Where do they drain? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Southerly across County Road C. <br /> <br />MR. MANGLE: Why does the assessment line go that far south <br />on the other side of the street. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Because this is the area being picked up <br />according to our preliminary review. This is the area that will <br />drain toward the catch basins at the intersection of Iona and Dale. <br />If they do not drain that way we will not recommend they be <br />assessed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.