My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6793
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6700
>
res_6793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:11:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6793
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-78-15 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications
Resolution Date Passed
2/28/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />On the tax exempt property which is Northern States Power <br />Company, there are 75 feet and they will be assessed at $79.51 a <br />foot for $5,963, and the other residential property which is <br />apartment property will be assessed in the amount of $10,082 <br />which will raise a little over $15,000. The balance of the <br />$137,388 will corne from state aid funding. It is my under- <br />standing that St. Anthony will be assessing each residential <br />property $1700 a lot whereas ours will not. <br /> <br />It's a 20-year assessment, 8% carrying charge, with the <br />right to prepay assessments within 30 days after the assessment <br />roll is adopted. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I will open the hearing and ask that each <br />speaker come to the microphone and identify him or herself and <br />give their address. You may ask questions or make a statement <br />pro or con. <br /> <br />MRS. KATHLEEN MAIZEL, 3040 Highcrest :1 just have a couple <br />of questions. What is the width of the existing road at this <br />point? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Approximately 32 feet. It's not precisely <br />uniform, but generally speaking it's 32 feet. <br /> <br />MRS. MAIZEL I spoke with a gentleman today who gave me <br />some information in reference from the central road it would be <br />18 feet and 18 feet. Where is the central road - where the <br />manholes are or where you decide for the 36 foot roadway? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: By center of the road, I presume he would <br />mean the section line dividing the Roseville and St. Anthony <br />side. <br /> <br />MRS. MAIZEL <br /> <br />Would that be the manholes? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: No, they are not in the center of the road. <br />Our consultant is here. How far are they off center? <br /> <br />MR. SHORT: There is a (inaudible) there. They vary. <br />Roseville side has a 33-foot right-of-way. St. Anthony 30 foot. <br />(Inaudible) line marked center line is the center line and the <br />line between St. Anthony and Roseville (inaudible) and that is the <br />centerline of the 36-foot road. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I guess to give you the best determination now, <br />I think the existing pavement is more or less centered on the center <br />line. <br /> <br />MRS. MAIZEL We wouldn't be able to know which side of the <br />road would have the difference - more of the difference taken out <br />of. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Assuming the centerline of the existing pavement <br />is on the section line, the proposal would be to have the 36-foot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.