My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6793
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6700
>
res_6793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:11:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6793
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-78-15 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications
Resolution Date Passed
2/28/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6 <br /> <br />MRS. WESTLAND: What stage are you at right now in this whole <br />planning thing, and if it goes through, when would the construction <br />be started? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: At this time both St. Anthony and Roseville <br />are almost right together. They had their hearing last night. <br />The next stage would be, if it's ordered by Roseville as well, <br />to have the consultant prepare the final plan. One of the problems <br />of doing this immediately is that St. Anthony has some severe sani- <br />tary sewer problems on their side. Their sewers are dipping down <br />and they're having back-up problems. They would like to (inaudible) <br />those lines so that while the street is torn up they could repair <br />the sewers then. That work will probably not be able to be done <br />until late in March, and they will analyze that and they will have <br />to work out what they want to do, so I would guess it's probably <br />going to be late June at least or the first of July and it will <br />take most of the summer. Realistically it will take two or three <br />months. It's not to say your road will be closed all that time <br />but construction will take some period. <br /> <br />MR. WARREN ARNDT, 3082 Highcrest: If you have the original <br />petition, it did request a stop sign at Lydia and I think the reasons <br />were indicated in the petition, but I think you should feel that <br />you have been adequately requested at this time to look at the <br />traffic and the speed situation on the street. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: We would like to be able to see it after it's <br />in instead of having conjecture as to what it will be or not be. <br /> <br />MR. ARNDT: The speed has been in excess, we feel, the way the <br />road is now, and I think it's as good a road as any for (inaudible) <br />to test automobiles for rattles and squeaks so I think it would be <br />more dangerous. I would request that the parking be on the St. <br />Anthony side because St. Anthony has a park on the west side of the <br />street and it's widely used. There are a lot of people who stop <br />and let children off that use the park. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: If there's no one else, I will close the hearing. <br />What is the Council's pleasure? <br /> <br />COUNCIL~ffiN ANDERSON: One question on that parking. Can we <br />switch that no-parking as you go up and down the street, or no <br />parking all on the inside or all on the west side, or part east <br />and part west. Is there any minimum distance involved? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: You can switch it back and forth, but I guess <br />we would recommend it to be on one side continually, or at least for <br />an extensive period so the motorist does not have to start <br />jogging back and forth around parked cars. We would like to put <br />them in a lane and keep them there. <br /> <br />Councilman Curley then introduced the following resolution <br />and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 6793 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.