CC_Minutes_2010_1213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

illi846 Commissioner Boerigter questioned why this parcel couldn't be considered with other anomaly W847 properties, like the adjacent property currently designated as Park Open Space. 848 Mr. Paschke noted that there were sixty -seven (67) properties caught in advance of tonight's 849 public notice being sent out, and if this parcel were added to that list, the end result would be the 850 same, but he wasn't sure that the appropriate process would be followed. Due to the notice going 851 out, Mr. Paschke advised that the City Council needed to weigh in on the decision to determine 852 whether the current designation was appropriate versus removing it; noting that the City Council, 853 at this time, wont be discussing the properties designated "black" on the May 2010 draft zoning 854 map, as it would be doing with the other properties. Mr. Paschke noted that the one parcel was 855 designated Single family Residential, and may be guided to something other than Park Open 856 Space, however, he noted that the City was not currently in a financial position to consider 857 additional properties for park use. Mr. Paschke noted that, while the Parks and Recreation Master 858 Plan process may indicate this or other parcels throughout the community that may be a park, 859 pond or other open space use, the Comprehensive Plan designation guiding the parcel as a Park 860 was inappropriate and it needed to be designated something other than Open Space; but would 861 need to proceed through a public process to change that designation. 862 Mr. Paschke noted that if the parcel remained designated HD, the property owner would not be 863 able to build a single family home on the lot; and that to amend that designation, a separate action 864 (motion) would be indicated for designation other than currently guided, for recommendation by 865 the Commission to the City Council, at which time it would be added to the listed anomaly 866 properties. Mr. Paschke reminded Commissioners that they had the ability to discuss the merits of 1. each case brought forward during public comment, and then to choose whether they advocated 868 any change or not. 869 Mr. Paschke suggested that the Commission may choose to recommend that this lot (556 County 870 Road C PIN 12- 29 -23 -22 -0003) be removed for inclusion with the list of anomaly properties, 871 even though not previously identified as such, but needing further consideration for potential 872 Comprehensive Plan Amendment due to the terrain, anticipating that this process may place an 873 additional 2 -3 month delay on zoning designation and redevelopment; and adjacent to the 874 anomaly property adjacent on the east (558? County Road C). 875 Commissioners Gottfried and Boerigter and Chair Doherty concurred with staffs' 876 recommendation; speaking in support of an amendment designating both parcels as LDR -1. 877 Commissioner Wozniak expressed concern about including the corner parcel. 878 Bahnemann Parcel (Eugene Bahnemann), 2656 N Lexington Avenue 879 Chair Doherty advocated that the proposed zoning designation not be changed for this parcel; 880 noting the series of properties on the east side of Lexington Avenue guided for HD; opining that 881 this corridor was a prime area for redevelopment for HD due to its public transit accessibility. 882 Each Commissioner concurred that no designation change be proposed.