Laserfiche WebLink
*993 Ayes: 7 <br /> MIII994 Nays: 0 <br /> 995 Motion carried. <br /> 996 c. PROJECT FILE 0017 <br /> 997 Request by the Roseville Planning Division Adopting new regulations for Title 10, Zoning <br /> 998 Regulations, pertaining to the COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DISTRICTS <br /> 999 Chair Doherty opened the Public Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 10:51 p.m., suggesting <br /> 1000 that, due to the late hour, this item be continued to the July 2010 meeting. <br /> 1001 MOTION <br /> 1002 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Best to CONTINUE this item to the July <br /> 1003 2010 meeting. <br /> 1004 Ayes: 7 <br /> 1005 Nays: 0 <br /> 1006 Motion carried. <br /> 1007 Extract from the July 7, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> 1008 Public Hearings Continued <br /> 009 a. PROJECT FILE 0017 <br /> 010 Request by the Roseville Planning Division Adopting new regulations for Title 10, Zoning <br /> 1011 Regulations, pertaining to the COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DISTRICTS <br /> 1012 Chair Doherty opened the Public Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 5:53 p.m. <br /> 1013 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed this request and recommended approval of draft <br /> 1014 Commercial and Mixed Use District requirements, establishing new regulations under Title 10, <br /> 1015 Zoning Regulations, pertaining to the COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE DISTRCITS, as <br /> 1016 presented and detailed in the Request for Planning Commission Action dated July 7, 2010. <br /> 1017 Mr. Paschke advised that the primary proposed changes to the existing Zoning Code, in effect <br /> 1018 since the inception of the City of Roseville, with multiple amendments throughout the years, <br /> 1019 included formatting for better clarify; the addition of illustrative examples of the intent of various <br /> 1020 sections of the ordinance; and those substantive changes to the existing code detailed in Section <br /> 1021 4.2 of the Request for Planning Commission Action dated July 7, 2010. Mr. Paschke advised that <br /> 1022 those changes were related to design standards; a simplification of the Use Table; clarification <br /> 1023 and an update of dimensional standards; and the addition of a Mixed Use District, initially <br /> 1024 encompassing the Twin Lakes area, and including both general and specific design/performance <br /> 1025 standards. <br />