CC_Minutes_2010_1213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1334 At the request of Chair Doherty, Mr. Paschke advised that as a next step, the City Council would 1335 discuss adoption of specific requirements for creation of a regulating map and procedure, with 1336 that process coming back before the Commission for consideration. 1337 Chair Doherty and Commissioners were of a majority consensus that the City Council be aware 1338 of the concerns related to the regulating map. 1339 Mr. Paschke noted that, without the map, there could be no development; and again assured the 1340 Commission's that their comments and discussion from this meeting would be directed to the 1341 City Council. 1342 Recess 1343 Chair Doherty briefly recessed the meeting at about 7:54 p.m. and reconvened at about 8:06 p.m. 1344 b. PROJECT FILE 0017 1345 Request by the Roseville Planning Division Adopting new regulations for Title 10, Zoning 1346 Regulations, pertaining to the RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 1347 Chair Doherty continued the Public Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 8:07 p.m. 1348 City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed this request and recommended approval of the 1349 proposed new text for all Residential Districts in the City of Roseville, adopting new regulations 1350 for Title 10, Zoning Regulations, pertaining to all RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, as detailed in the 1351 Request for Planning Commission Action dated July 7, 2010. 1352 Mr. Paschke noted that the proposed draft as periodically revised had been available on the City's 1353 website since February or March of 2010; and had been heard at the Planning Commission on at 1354 least two (2) occasions to -date for discussion and modification, with public comment. Mr. 1355 Paschke noted that staff was advocating the proposed revisions based on a multitude of 1356 developments post -1959 that were not in compliance with existing code creating a need for 1357 variances; with related issues and problems, with related maps displayed at previous open houses. 1358 Mr. Paschke reviewed the major changes contained in Section 4, including refinement defining 1359 and determining when and where to allow accessory structures (1005.02) throughout the 1360 document, with a universal term yet to be defined and still elusive; proposed design standards 1361 limiting the amount of garage door emphasized on street frontage to enhance pedestrian 1362 environments; design standards for multi family structures; and a modification of dimensional 1363 standards and setback areas. 1364 Member Boerigter requested, and fellow Commissioners concurred, that future drafts be provided 1365 in redlined format to allow comparison from one draft to another for reference. 1366 Mr. Paschke provided, as a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part thereof, written 1367 comments from Member Wozniak specific to Residential Districts (Chapter 1005). Mr. Paschke 1368 reviewed and provided staff responses for Member Wozniak's and members and staff discussed 1369 the merits of each to reach a consensus.