res_6870 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2 subdivided within a three year period of the improvement, that it is to be included in the special assessment proceedings. The reason for this, in my opinion, is because in (inaudible) occasions, a new subdivision is coming in or a rezoning takes place and as a result it's necessary to widen or reconstruct a road. This would be the appropriate time to do it. In this case, however, there was a subdivision near Brenner - a little north and one lot to the south that was approved within the three year period so these people were sent notices as well. It's the staff's opinion that inasmuch as there really was no relationship between that platting and the improvement that this would be a good case for consideration for dropping the assessments because, as you all know, the city no longer assesses single family residential property along county roads or MSA roadways for roadway improvements, so it would be our recommendation that although the people were notified as per the code requirement that those five lots directly adjacent to (inaudible) Brenner on the east side of the road be dropped for special assessments. MR. POPOVICH: The total cost is $66,402, and while there is a frontage of 8,055 feet, if you follow that policy for residential property, there are only 3,473 feet that would be assessed at $8.24 a foot for the multiple, commercial and industrial property to raise $28,876. The balance of $37,526 would be raised by general taxes. Again, this would be a 20 year assessment with the 8% carrying charge, with the usual policy of prepayment or deferment applicable. MR. ANDRE: Mr. Robert Duford and Mr. Tom Steinbring have writt en indicating that they oppose the assessment on curb and gutter. That has been explained by Mr. Honchell and they would not be assessed for the curb and gutter. All persons pres~nt were then given the opporfunity to present oral objections, and all such objections were tabulated as follows: No one appeared. Mayor Demos closed the hearing and Councilman Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 6870 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR I~WROVEMENT NO. P-76-9 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as follows: