res_6871 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3 MR. NORMAN ALBRECHT, 3069 West Owasso Boulevard: Asked if he would be assessed again at some future time if something is done to control the level of the pond on his property. MRS. MARIA HINZ, 2995 West Owasso Boulevard: Mr. Andre had referred to the communication received from Mr. Gene Hinz, and Mrs. Hinz wished to tell the Council that the facts stated in the letter are what they feel. No one else wished to be heard and Mayor Demos closed the hearing. MR. JOHN MORRISON, 3151 West OWasso Boulevard: Said the state law provides that unless a benefit to the property can be shown by an appraisal before and after construction of an improvement there can be no assessment and he felt the Council should consider the legality of the assessment. Councilman Curley then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 6871 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. P-ST-76-23 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for Improvement No. P-ST-76-23 against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minne- sota Statutes, Chapter 429, as amended, and notice~has been duly mailed and published, as required by law, that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open for public inspection, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objec- tions, if any, to such proposed assessments. 2. This Council, having heard and considered all objec- tions so presented, and being fully advised in the premises, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumer- ated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respec- tive lots, pieces and parcels of land therein.