Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Tuesday, May 18, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />Acting Roseville Police Chief Captain Rick Mathwig and Police/Community Liaison Sarah <br />Mahmud concurred with Mr. Trudgeon's analysis and spoke in support of the need to keep <br />renters and property owners accountable. Acting Chief Mathwig stated that in some multiple- <br />unit rental properties in Roseville, their owners have not been good stewards of City services, <br />often through violation of multiple ordinances at a single property, and provided specific <br />examples of some of those situations. <br />Discussion among Commissioners and staff included other communities having passed similar <br />ordinances and the status or results achieved in those communities, among whom were the <br />Cities of Bloomington, Eagan, Robbinsdale, Faribault, and Golden Valley; modeling of the <br />draft ordinance as presented based on the existing ordinances in those communities; additional <br />staff time required initially to track nuisance violation data and send out notice letters to <br />violators versus current resources required in dealing with problem properties; potential <br />stumbling blocks for fee determination equated with staff time, squad response time and cost, <br />and the number of officers on call at the time of the nuisance call, with a cost-benefit analysis <br />required to determine that value; consideration of a blanket fee similar to the aggregate fee for <br />false burglary alarms and incremental increases, while needing to consider extraordinary <br />situations to accommodate full compensation; and the need to mesh and incorporate the fees <br />with the remainder of the City's existing fee schedule. <br />Further discussion included how to verify actual and valid calls versus neighbor disputes on a <br />case by case basis, with a potential to waive fees based on the specific situation; current officer <br />calls for invalid nuisance issues on a daily basis; and other portions of City Code defining <br />"nuisance;" with an entire chapter of Code dedicated to defining "nuisances," but this one <br />focused specifically on the Police Department rather than Code Enforcement issues (i.e., tall <br />grass, or junk in a yard); and the office of the Police Chief determining if and when fees should <br />be waived through working with property owners/management to determine whether eviction <br />processes are indicated or if the management plan sufficiently provides for mediation, with the <br />appeal process to the City Manager's Office consistent with other appeal processes. <br />Motion: Member Majerus moved, seconded by Member Pust to recommend to the City <br />Council enactment of an ordinance to impose and collect fees from the owner(s), <br />occupant(s), or both at properties requiring repeat response by City staff to nuisance <br />complaints. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Abstentions: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed a specific multi-family rental property in Roseville that provided a <br />positive resolution through cooperation and partnership between the City's Police Department <br />through the efforts of Ms. Mahmud and development of a Security Plan; and expressed his <br />appreciation to the Police Department in achieving these positive results. <br />Chair Maschka noted that this provided for a great example of a good community policing <br />model. <br />d. Living Smarter Marketing Campaign <br />Housing Coordinator Jeanne Kelsey reviewed the three (3) responses received to the City's <br />Request for Proposals (RFP) for a marketing campaign, as detailed in the Request for HRA <br />Action dated May 18, 2010; with one party not responding directly as part of the RFP criteria; <br />and the remaining two (2) parties interviewed last week by staff and Member Masche. Ms. <br />Kelsey advised that staff was recommending the hiring of Mr. George Hornik, based on his <br />