My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_HRC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights Commission
>
Minutes
>
2008 Minutes
>
2008_HRC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2011 10:34:48 AM
Creation date
2/18/2011 10:34:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Venters asked how best to receive a response from the City Attorney, rationale <br />for the City Attorney's opinion and policy issue considerations under the City Council's domain. <br />Discussion included Section 8 housing provisions, disclosure of information on rental application <br />forms, First Amendment rights and applicable state and federal laws, whether the City Attorney <br />should be asked to attend an HRC meeting, if Commissioner Venters should meet with him <br />during office hours at City Hall and cost implications for the City Attorney time. <br />Commissioner Venters said he preferred a written response rather than verbal so an exact record <br />of HRC concerns and City Attorney responses would be available. <br />City Manager Malinen noted the unique situation with the HRC proposal, with the usual <br />procedure being that the City Council meets with the HRC to give direction for the <br />Commission's focus. The Commission would then bring recommendations to the City Council <br />for their consideration. While not trying to detract from the HRC's proactive initiative, City <br />Manager Malinen asked if a majority of Councilmembers support the proposed ordinance, saying <br />it may be awkward since it was not something that the City Council had looked at and referred to <br />the HRC. <br />Further discussion included the HRC's charge to create a safe environment for the community, <br />recognizing the legal implications with the proposed ordinance, potential legal exposure with <br />financial implications to the City with such an ordinance, thus the City Attorney's caution. <br />City Manager Malinen said Councilmembers had received a copy of the opinion letter, and <br />Commissioner Venters noted that Councilmember Pust had e- mailed him and City Manager <br />Malinen seeking background information. <br />Discussion included whether it would be appropriate to go directly to the City Council for their <br />input on the issue, with Commissioner Venters volunteered to send an e -mail to the City Council <br />to gauge their willingness and to work with the City Attorney to clarify potential legal issues. <br />City Manager Malinen said he would alert the City Attorney of Commissioner Venters' interest <br />to meet for further discussion. <br />Forum on Race/Diversity Training <br />Discussion continued from the January meeting on diversity training and Chair Delmore and <br />Commissioner McKenzie's contacts with other communities and /or agencies. <br />City Manager Malinen's updated Commissioners on the self directed, on -line training for all <br />City staff beginning in April, with modules available for diversity, harassment and customer <br />service training. <br />Discussion included whether the HRC could access the training for review or personal training, <br />and City Manager Malinen offered to check with the City's Information Technology Director <br />about e -mail access and options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.