My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0110
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2011 12:25:26 PM
Creation date
2/18/2011 12:25:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 10,2011 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Code Update to bring the City's Zoning Code into compliance with the City's up- <br /> dated Comprehensive Plan; and subsequent appeal of that decision by the Woods <br /> Edge Homeowners Association and surrounding Old Highway 8 neighborhood <br /> residents regarding the decision to rezone 3253 and 3261 Old Highway 8 from R- <br /> 1, Single Family Residential District to HDR-1, High Density Residential District. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the basis of the appeal; review of the appeal by City staff <br /> and the City Attorney; and their determination that there was no provision under <br /> the new City Code to allow for residents to appeal a decision made by the City <br /> Council to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Mr. Trudgeon noted staff's re- <br /> sponse to Ms. Mix by letter dated January 5, 2010 (Attachment D) and recourse <br /> available to the appellants to seek judicial review of the City Council action pur- <br /> suant to Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 462.361. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that no action by the Board was recommended at this time, <br /> and that this case was presented for informational purposes only. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> advised that, if an appeal was received regarding this above-mentioned adminis- <br /> trative ruling, the Board of Adjustment and Appeals would need to look at the <br /> administrative ruling and determine whether staff's determination was correct un- <br /> der Chapter 1009.08 of City Code. <br /> Member McGehee asked if it was possible for the City Council to take action it- <br /> self without appeal from the public. <br /> City Attorney Bartholdi advised that there were procedures in place should a <br /> member of the City Council come forward to initiate placing such a matter on a <br /> City Council agenda. <br /> Member Willmus clarified that this would be done after the City Council recon- <br /> vened as the City Council. <br /> Chair Roe concurred, noting that this would be addressed under the Rules of Pro- <br /> cedure adopted by the City Council. <br /> Chair Roe opened the meeting to public comment specific to this issue. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Karen Hagen, 2485 County Road C-2 West <br /> Ms. Hagen requested that the Board reconsider, noting that while many residents <br /> of the neighborhood would prefer not to continue attending public meetings re- <br /> garding this issue, they were committed and asked that the Board take into con- <br /> sideration that evident commitment, despite staff's recommendation. Ms. Hagen <br /> asked that the Board carefully review this neighborhood and whether the deci- <br /> sions made to-date are in the best interest of the neighborhood and its residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.