Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 04, 2010 <br />Page 10 <br />recommended land use designation from LR to NB, inadvertently omitted from <br />445 <br />agenda packet materials. <br />446 <br />Additional Public Comment <br />447 <br />Megan Dushin, 2249 St. Stephen Street <br />448 <br />Ms. Dushin asked the ramifications for his property in the proposed designation <br />449 <br />for the above-referenced properties on Saint Croix Street and Saint Stephen <br />450 <br />Street changing from POS to LR. <br />451 <br />Mr. Paschke advised that it would allow a single-family home to be constructed <br />452 <br />on the property, if not already existing, or provide future land use guidance. <br />453 <br />Ms. Dushin questioned the rationale for turning Water Pond designated land use <br />454 <br />into LR and whether that was an environmentally sound practice. <br />455 <br />Mr. Paschke reiterated that this was a housekeeping matter; noting that a <br />456 <br />number of the lot corrections and lots designated for Water ponding already had <br />457 <br />single-family homes developed on them. Mr. Paschke further advised that those <br />458 <br />proposed to change from POS to LR were privately-owned properties that should <br />459 <br />be zoned LR or parcels with homes already on them, making POS inappropriate <br />460 <br />as a designation. Mr. Paschke noted that many of these inconsistencies or <br />461 <br />errors continued to be carried forward from the 1970’s, or that at one time the <br />462 <br />City may have had a desire to utilize them for POS or to acquire them for such, <br />463 <br />often for storm water management purposes, a trail or a park. However, since <br />464 <br />there were not plans and/or funds to do so now, Mr. Paschke opined that it was <br />465 <br />inappropriate to guide them as POS when such zoning designation was <br />466 <br />inconsistent with their actual or potential use. <br />467 <br />Ms. Dushin questioned whether there could be a private park acquired by <br />468 <br />residents without it being City-owned property. <br />469 <br />Mr. Paschke advised that it would be inappropriate for the City’s Comprehensive <br />470 <br />Plan and Map to designate private properties as POS since the City didn’t control <br />471 <br />or manage them. <br />472 <br />Member Gottfried opined that ownership of the property was a vital consideration <br />473 <br />and guided this discussion and desire for consistency and continuity for this <br />474 <br />housekeeping practice; and commended staff for their thorough review of parcels <br />475 <br />throughout the City and for bringing them to the forefront for discussion and <br />476 <br />correction as appropriate. Member Gottfried further opined that if a private <br />477 <br />property owner chose to give a parcel to the City that was another discussion, at <br />478 <br />which time the City could revisit rezoning a parcel to POS. <br />479 <br />Mr. Paschke noted that for many years, starting in the 1970’s or before, zoning <br />480 <br />was the controlling document and the Comprehensive Plan was not the higher <br />481 <br />authority or guiding plan. However, Mr. Paschke advised that, over the last <br />482 <br />decade, the Comprehensive Plan had become the ruling and controlling <br />483 <br />document, and zoning needed to be consistent with that Plan. Mr. Paschke <br />484 <br />advised that, unfortunately, the City had not historically changed the Zoning Map <br />485 <br />to remain consistent, thus creating many of the anomaly properties. Mr. Paschke <br />486 <br />noted that, unfortunately as well, some of the properties were missed during the <br />487 <br />Comprehensive Plan Update process; and this was the appropriate opportunity <br />488 <br />to address each of the parcels. <br />489 <br />Chair Doherty observed, to the City’s credit, that the easiest thing to do would be <br />490 <br />to continue ignoring the anomalies; however, staff had reviewed each parcel in <br />491 <br />the City to make sure they were consistent, and also expressed appreciation to <br />492 <br />staff for making this effort after thirty (30) years. <br />493 <br />Carol Mordorskel, 2241 Dellwood Avenue (property adjacent to Roseville <br />494 <br />Ramsey County Library) <br />495 <br /> <br />