2010-08-04_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, August 04, 2010 Page 6 to be corrected, since the parcel had a house already built on it, and should be 246 designated as LR. 247 2030 County Road D – Half of Property zoned business in 1970’s to allow salon 248 Mr. Paschke advised that the current designation of LR (Low Density Residential) 249 should be corrected to NB (Neighborhood Business) for both the north and south 250 portions to be consistent with the use of the site, since this was one lot. 251 Gunnar Pettersen, Current Property Owner 252 The property owner advised that there was originally a residence on both 253 parcels, but that when he’d developed the salon on the corner, it had been 254 rezoned with a setback variance to allow the house and shop on the lot line, and 255 that it was still designated as two (2) lots, but that he had left it as one address to 256 avoid confusion. 257 Mr. Paschke advised that it hadn’t been detected since the 2 lots were listed 258 under one PID and combined for tax purposes. 259 1085 Roma Avenue – Owned by adjacent business 260 Staff recommended designation from LR to NB for consistency with the land use 261 as a business (a multi-tenant office building) since the 1990’s. 262 2088 Fry Street – 3 unit apartment 263 Staff recommended land use designation from the current LR to MR, consistent 264 with its use. 265 2211 Hamline Avenue 266 Staff recommended land use designation from LR to O (Office). 267 2353 Chatsworth Street – Real Life Church 268 Mr. Paschke advised that, unfortunately when the Comprehensive Plan 269 Amendment process was done, this parcel was not included in that zoning 270 change for all churches and other institutional uses to go to IN (Institutional) 271 designation, and was being corrected at this time. 272 Richard A. Fair – 39 Mallard Road – North Oaks 273 Mr. Fair advised that he had received notice of the proposed designation change; 274 however, he was unsure of the process when proposed regulations for IN zoning 275 are still in their draft form; and expressed his preference to review the 276 designation and any ramifications on the church for that property. 277 Mr. Paschke advised that, once the regulations are completed in their draft form, 278 they would come before the Planning Commission for review and public 279 comment, possibly in September. Mr. Paschke suggested that the speaker refer 280 to the City’s website or provide staff with a name and e-mail address to receive 281 future notice. 282 Mr. Fair advised that the Church also owns the property across the street at 2315 283 Lowell Avenue, currently having a single-family dwelling on it, and noted rezoning 284 as HD and sought additional information on ramifications of that designation; 285 noting that the home had originally been a parsonage and remained part of the 286 church property. 287 Mr. Paschke, while not having the property’s history available at this time, noted 288 that the 2315 parcel had been guided as HDR for some time and that there was 289 no recommendation to change that designation at this time. 290 Mr. Lloyd clarified that, since 1979, the parcel at 2315 had been identified as LR 291 land use, but that the zoning had never been corrected to be consistent with that 292 designation. 293 2758 and 2759 Virginia Avenue 294 Staff noted that the parcels may have been identified at one time by the City for 295