My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0124
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2011 2:35:46 PM
Creation date
2/23/2011 2:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 24,2011 <br /> Page 6 <br /> communities used for their vehicle turnover, with the majority usually closer to <br /> 100,000 miles. Councilmember McGehee asked why the department had selected <br /> Dodge Chargers. <br /> Chief Mathwig noted that, while the Dodge Charger came in second choice to the <br /> Chevrolet Caprice and other limited police package pursuit vehicles, the Squad <br /> Committee recommended the Charger as vehicle of choice since Chevrolet could <br /> not guarantee the state bid price. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned why the recommendation was for a Che- <br /> vrolet Tahoe for replacement of exiting canine vehicles; opining that the dimen- <br /> sions of the Charger are larger than other vehicles. Councilmember McGehee <br /> further questioned why several of the Department's existing vehicles could not be <br /> retrofitted as canine units. <br /> Chief Mathwig advised that the design and size of the metal cage for canine offic- <br /> ers limited the type of vehicle that could safely house the canines during pursuit, <br /> other than the Crown Victoria, scheduled to be discontinued in 2011, and rated <br /> the worst for braking and acceleration. Chief Mathwig explained that there was <br /> several thousand dollars of additional equipment added after factory for each <br /> squad, in addition to other equipment on the canine units, making it less cost- <br /> efficient to retrofit that equipment on fleet units scheduled to go out of service due <br /> to their high mileage and doubling labor efforts. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that, in her research with other communities, she <br /> had been told that the Tahoe did not handle as well as other police vehicles, got <br /> poor gas mileage, and caused resentment from taxpayers in communities when <br /> truck-like vehicles were used as squads. <br /> Chief Mathwig advised that the vehicles used by the Department were stripped <br /> down models, pursuit rated, and according to annual Michigan State Police test- <br /> ing of police package cars, the Tahoe rated higher than the Crown Victoria. Chief <br /> Mathwig offered to further review ratings with Councilmember McGehee outside <br /> the confines of the meeting. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned the cost difference between the Tahoe and <br /> Charger, with Chief Mathwig estimating approximately $3,000 price difference. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Chief Mathwig further reviewed the <br /> projected mileage among vehicles; canine cage design; and significant review of <br /> the Squad Committee prior to recommending replacement vehicles. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her preference to wait longer to replace the <br /> vehicles. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.