My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6929
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6900
>
res_6929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:12:44 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:02:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6929
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-79-19 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6 <br /> <br />the first surface. He said you have a road in good condition <br />and with no deterioration. That was put in in the late 1960's. <br />Is it worth the price now? I know you have mentioned about <br />accidents and children in the streets. We have the same <br />problem on Western, and it's a speedway. On Cohansey there's a <br />minimum amount of traffic. The cars come from Cohansey, but <br />also come from County Road C, and being it's a two-block long <br />street there is not a lot of traffic. The school busses perhaps <br />and once a week disposal trucks and the milk truck several <br />times a week, but accidents were mentioned. I don't know if <br />there has ever been an accident on Oakcrest to my knowledge. <br /> <br />Now, the plan is that we will be one foot closer to the <br />street so that makes it closer than lO feet - whatever the <br />boulevard area is. It was mentioned we pay the 25%. The 75% <br />comes from the general fund. All right, would you consider <br />paying taxes for a road that's good? I wouldn't, and I don't think <br />the other Roseville residents would care to pay for a good road <br />either. Their tax dollars are too important. <br /> <br />My husband approached several of the people last fall about <br />the road, and one said he'd go along with it but he really <br />didn't care for it, and another said the blacktopping on my <br />road is pretty bad and it must be replaced so I might as well let <br />Roseville do it. One man couldn't come because he's working, and <br />he asked us to voice his disapproval. <br /> <br />The $8.75 figure I know we have, but how do we know with <br />inflation and now that we've heard about the interest charges, <br />how do we know what it will cost? Could it be $10 or $ll? <br /> <br />Before the Council passes "yes" <br />drive up Oakcrest and see if we need <br />instead of my husband because he has <br />and when he says something, he means <br />me. <br /> <br />or "no", would <br />another road. <br />a pretty sharp <br />it. Thank you <br /> <br />you please <br />I'm speaking <br />tongue <br />for hearing <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT STADY, 444 Oakcrest: That's the corner of <br />Cohansey and Oakcrest. The signers of this petition have been <br />contacted again and still are in favor of it. The road at the <br />other end near Western is probably in better shape than the <br />road is at Cohansey and Oakcrest. That road started out about <br />three or four years ago with small holes in it. They are now <br />about the size of an automobile tire, and each year they grow. <br />Maintenance comes out and fills the holes and does an adequate <br />job, but each year it's a bigger hole because the existing tar <br />is being knocked out. The road is a hazzard, and I have to <br />agree with the other speaker. I do not believe there has been <br />an accident because I think it's a miracle the way they come <br />down the hill and (inaudible) sliding into Cohansey. Cohansey <br />is a well-traveled street. Thank you for your time. <br /> <br />MR. JERRY KIDD, 436 Oakcrest: I'm the second house up <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.