My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6929
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6900
>
res_6929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:12:44 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:02:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6929
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-79-19 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9 <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: When you get back in there, even though you're <br />raising it, will that put the edge of the driveway at about the <br />same slant? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: For the ones on the north side there should be <br />a noticeable improvement in the grade situation. <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: At least up to the property line we're pro- <br />posing to bring it up so they will have a flatter landing between <br />the curb and the property line, or in most of the cases, other <br />than one driveway, they're all concrete - to within a foot of the <br />right-of-way line. We're proposing to go back to the concrete <br />and giving them the best grade from that point. None of the <br />driveways were proposed to be dug up to the garage and re-laid. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: The Peterson residence on Western and <br />Oakcrest - how will that grade be affecting their property? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The roadway will end up slightly higher than <br />it is today which will mean a better match than (inaudible). <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: Would the road be an improvement? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Yes. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I guess the whole bond market makes it <br />somewhat - makes you somewhat hesitant to take any action. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: I think if there's action at the legislature <br />it should happen pretty soon. If we ordered in the improve- <br />ment, within the next two weeks we should know. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I do understand certain cities were going to <br />give certain legislators (inaudible) and done later at a higher <br />cost that the taxpayers would be reminded of that, so I don't <br />think we have quite the same (inaudible) or the bond selling <br />ability to sell a thing like that, but perhaps if you have <br />$28 million - <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: Am I correct, Mr. popovich, that we can <br />order this improvement and defer the implementation of this work <br />until a later day? <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: A number of communities have ordered the <br />improvement so the engineer's work can be done, and have ordered <br />the bids and have said that the bids must be firm for 30 to 60 <br />days and that gives them an opportunity to test the bond market <br />to see what financing they can get. Then you have your financing <br />and you can go ahead with the improvement. If it doesn't meet <br />your satisfaction, you don't award the bids. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: It's sort of unusual that when lO out <br />of the 13 people that signed petitions that - that's 77% and <br />that's quite a high ratio. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.