My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6930
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6900
>
res_6930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:12:45 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6930
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-79-20 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />14 <br /> <br />I don't think we're going to change the need situation as far as <br />that sewer and water proposal is concerned. There is going to <br />be a need for it, and fairly soon. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: The assessment hearing is usually the August <br />after the completion of all the work which, if this were done in <br />1981, it would be in 1981. At that point you may claim that you <br />haven't received sufficient benefits, etc. and we can make an <br />adjustment at that time, and it would give us time to order it <br />in and would give us time to work this thing out. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: I think the Council could indicate they would <br />give special review to the problem being discussed at this <br />hearing, not that they'd be committing themselves. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We can make an exception or (inaudible). We <br />certainly should be able to work something out. It appears <br />to me there was a lack of forethought in the actual design of sewer <br />and water way back when. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: No, the street was supposed to go through. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: Would you object to us ordering it in <br />and you wait until August following the comPLetion of construction <br />and we review your assessment at that time? ' <br /> <br />MR. WIDERSKI: For the water and sewer - not street or <br />cul-de-sac. Yes, I'm agreeable to that. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: If you adopt a resolution based on what he <br />said, you would be ordering that part of the improvement that <br />calls for sewer and water, and deleting t~e street. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY then introduced the following resolu- <br />tion and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution NO.~O <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-W-P-79-20 <br />UNDER AND PURSUANT TO <br />MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 429 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statutes 1961, Chapter 429, as amended, the Council held a <br />public hearing on the proposed construction of Improvement No. <br />SS-W-P-79-20 consisting of the installation of sanitary sewer and <br />services, watermain and services, bituminous paving, concrete <br />curb and gutter, and necessary appurtenances in the general <br />area of Wagner Street between Woodruff Avenue and Western Street, <br />and Western Street at Wagner at a cost then estimated at <br />$66,281.69, and substantially in accordance with the preliminary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.