My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0214
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2011 3:53:30 PM
Creation date
3/8/2011 3:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 14, 2011 <br /> Page 23 <br /> Mayor Roe noted that as part of any development proposal, traffic studies were <br /> reviewed. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:28 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 8:42 p.m. <br /> 12. Business (Action) Items <br /> a. Consider a Resolution to Authorize City to Certify Unpaid Utility and Other <br /> Charges to the Property Tax Rolls <br /> Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed this request as detailed in the RCA dated <br /> February 14, 2011; reminding all that those property owners listed (Attachment <br /> B) had the opportunity to pay the balance prior to certification. <br /> Willmus moved, McGehee seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10880 (Attach- <br /> ment A) entitled, "Resolution Directing the County Auditor to Levy Unpaid Wa- <br /> ter, Sewer, and Other City Charges for Payable 2012 or Beyond," as detailed in <br /> Attachment B to the Request for Council Action dated February 14, 2011. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson; McGehee; Willmus; Pust; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Councilmember Johnson clarified, and Mr. Miller responded affirmatively, that <br /> the large amount outstanding on the former Fuddrucker's property would move <br /> forward for resolution by any new property owner or resolved as part of a nego- <br /> tiated closing settlement. <br /> b. Consider City Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 511 Hill- <br /> top <br /> Codes Coordinator Don Munson reviewed the request for abatement for unre- <br /> solved violations of City Code at 511 Hilltop as detailed in the RCA dated Febru- <br /> ary 14, 2011. Mr. Munson noted that there were several revisions to the request <br /> from those listed in the packet. Mr. Munson reviewed the history of this property, <br /> with it having received over nine neighbor complaints over the last five years; and <br /> previous City Council abatement for building maintenance violations; and the <br /> property owner's consistent practice of waiting until the last possible moment to <br /> address issues. <br /> Mr. Munson provided pictures of this rental property in January of 2010 when it <br /> was vacant and without siding; and property notice in September of 2010 that the <br /> Building Permit was null and void due to inactivity, and subsequent request by the <br /> property owner for an extension to complete it. Mr. Munson advised that, with <br /> ongoing lack of resolution over eighteen months, and staff had initiated this ab- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.