My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0214
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2011 3:53:30 PM
Creation date
3/8/2011 3:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 14, 2011 <br /> Page 25 <br /> Discussion included siding materials on the dormers; outside debris and material; <br /> clarification that the Public Works Department had turned off the water in the <br /> street; winter shut off rules not applicable since the heat and power had been <br /> turned off before October 15; and the length of the process due to tracking owner- <br /> ship and mortgage holders of the property to provide notice to the bank as well; <br /> with staff noting that processing foreclosed properties took longer for noticing. <br /> Mr. Munson advised that when the notice to repair the structure was processed by <br /> staff,no response had been received; and the Notice of Abatement had been post- <br /> ed on the property for one month; as well as notice given to the property owner of <br /> record and the bank with no response. Mr. Munson advised that the proposed to- <br /> tal abatement was estimated at $5,200. <br /> Further discussion included potential city action by May of 2011 based on receipt <br /> of bids for the work to be completed; and staff review and inspection of the entire <br /> property site once Xcel Energy provides notice of the utility shut off and when <br /> obvious City Code violations are evidenced, with staff knocking on the door of <br /> the subject property prior to walking around the property. <br /> Property Owner and Resident,Rob Ethan <br /> Mr. Ethan disputed several points made by staff as background information, ac- <br /> knowledging that there were several areas needing repair and repainting. Mr. <br /> Ethan advised that he was a single father, and referenced comments made earlier <br /> in the evening by Dr. Thein regarding the significant impacts and economic diffi- <br /> culties. Mr. Ethan advised that his son was a fourth generation Roseville resident, <br /> and asked for sufficient time to handle this without abatement. Mr. Ethan admit- <br /> ted that cost was a current issue; but clarified that the home was not in foreclo- <br /> sure, although very close, but assured Councilmembers that he was doing every- <br /> thing possible to prevent foreclosure. Mr. Ethan reviewed the attempts he'd made <br /> to complete the work on his own, and the difficulties he'd encountered with the <br /> outside staircase and remaining work needed. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned if the unregistered vehicle was still on site; and Mr. Ethan <br /> responded that it was, and was functioning,but not registered. <br /> Mr. Ethan advised that he was not aware that it was a violation and thanked Mr. <br /> Munson for alerting him to that and advised that he would simply put it in the ga- <br /> rage to serve as a replacement for his current vehicle. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted the many resources available to Mr. Ethan <br /> through the City's HRA to assist him, including volunteers who could help with <br /> painting and carpentry projects. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Munson advised that staff had re- <br /> ceived no neighbor complaints on this property to-date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.