CC_Minutes_2011_0214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February 14, 2011 Page 28 Mr. Paschke responded that it would not, that those items had already been ad- dressed in the standards for that District. Mr. Paschke advised that the City had made a huge investment in infrastructure in that area, and this document ad- dressed how that infrastructure would connect and serve future development; and that it would create, as an example, a Map and Plan to show how buildings would front next to corners. Mayor Roe suggested that the difference in this document and existing standards, charts and tables found in other areas of the code, was that it tailored it to this specific area based on the uniqueness of that area. Mr. Paschke responded that it may not be specific to all of Twin Lakes, but would only refer to Phase I, and exclude newer buildings already constructed, but taking older development sites and provide for their incorporation; with the existing Medical Center and four office/showroom buildings not being included in the proposed Plan. Councilmember Willmus observed that, from his perspective, this area had prop- erties with multiple owners, and this document would put all those redevelopment issues within the same technical guidelines so all parties would know what their property would eventually look like. Mr. Paschke advised that they property owners could then bring forward stan- dards based on design standards already in place. Johnson moved, Pust seconded, approval of The Cuningham Group to complete the Community Mixed Use Twin Lakes Regulating Map and Plan and enter into a Standard Agreement for Professional Services Roll Call Ayes: Johnson; Willmus; Pust; and Roe. Nays: McGehee. Motion carried. e. Consider Budget Calendar Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed the materials provided and detailed as part of the RCA dated February 14, 2011. Mr. Miller noted the template was pri- marily as prepared by Mayor Roe, and that the resolution (Attachment A) served to formalize the action; and included supporting documentation (Attachment B) similar to that provided in prior years allowing the current City Council a perspec- tive if they chose to adopt the proposed budget calendar. Mr. Miller noted that staff was attempting to anticipate questions of the City Council to determine and facilitate their information needs and the context in which they wanted to receive them.