Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 14, 2011 <br /> Page 8 <br /> a. Approve Public Improvement Contract and Public Improvement Easement <br /> and Maintenance Agreement for Applewood Point of Langton Lake (PF08- <br /> 020) (Former Consent Item 7.n) <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Malinen summarized the request as <br /> detailed in the Request for Council Action (RCA) dated February 14, 2011; for <br /> approval of the Applewood Pointe of Langton Lake Public Improvement Contract <br /> (Attachment A); and Public Improvement Easement and Maintenance Agreement <br /> (Attachment B) as presented. Mr. Malinen advised that these represented stan- <br /> dard public improvement project agreements between the City and the property <br /> developer, United Properties. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified this was related to the construction of a public street on this <br /> parcel. <br /> Councilmember Willmus, in his review and research of 2008 City Council meet- <br /> ings when this development was discussed, observed that staff had initially rec- <br /> ommended a 32' wide roadway from the cul-de-sac to the intersection of Mount <br /> Ridge Road. However, Councilmember Willmus noted that it appeared that the <br /> developer was proposing a 26' wide roadway up to the intersection of Mount <br /> Ridge Road, and then the width would increase to 32' to Langton Lake. <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz advised that he and Community Development <br /> Director Patrick Trudgeon had conferred; and their recollection was that staff had <br /> originally recommended the 32' wide roadway; however, subsequent City Coun- <br /> cil discussions and actions upon questioning by the developer for a 32' wide <br /> roadway, had led to the proposed reduced width for a portion of the roadway as <br /> indicated. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned if there would be any hardship in delaying <br /> action on this item to allow further verification and determine rationale for City <br /> Council action other than that recommended by staff; and whether the action had <br /> majority City Council support. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that a brief delay should not cause any immediate hardship <br /> to the developer; noting that a Conditional Building Permit had been issued that <br /> was set to expire on February 16, 2011, but that staff could extend that timeframe <br /> to accommodate the delay. <br /> Councilmember McGehee advised that she would support further review. <br /> Mayor Roe recalled that the revised width was based on concerns by the develop- <br /> er in having parking at the entrance/exit by the parking garage that could create <br /> traffic conflicts; but concurred with further research to clarify the road's width. <br />