My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6939
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6900
>
res_6939
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:12:49 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6939
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-79-2 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
4/14/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />up and I think that's one way to slow it. Another is closing <br />the street which would conform to the rest of that particular <br />block which is essentially a cul-de-sac type area (inaudible) <br />since if the survey is right, County Road Band Roselawn are <br />supposed to be the main feeder streets. (inaudible) that <br />general area is a residential. community. I know that <br />others would appreciate speaking to the concerns that they <br />have about the condition of the street. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I think we're over-simplifying when we <br />say Roselawn and County Road B are the collector streets. <br />They are the county roads. Collector streets lead to county <br />roads and this is a feeder street because you have the <br />other streets coming down to it both from the north and from <br />the south and entering out, and when we say it's residential - <br />when he talks about the residential neighborhood, he's talking <br />about that collective neighborhood between Fairview and <br />Snelling and from those streets (inaudible) not just Skillman <br />itself. I guess it would be pretty hard for me - I use it. <br />It's my feeder street, so supposing I want to go to Har-Mar. <br />What you're requiring me to do is go south and get hit as I <br />make a left-hand turn to the north - or to go to County Road B <br />and we have to acknowledge that on the north end of Har-Mar <br />there (inaudible) if I do go in that way it means I drive <br />all the way around that shopping center - you know what I <br />mean - and dodge some of the traffic that's backing out of <br />other parking places, so I understand why people use that <br />street. Like I said, I don't think we can reduce Roselawn <br />and County Road B to feeder streets or collectors because <br />they're county roads and any feeder is a street that goes <br />from a county (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. PERMAN: Is that the basis for its qualifications? <br />It's not arterial we're connecting with. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I might say something else. How much <br />are we spending on base replacement annually? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: It's in the $80,000 and $90,000 bracket <br /> <br />now. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We had a street program that went down <br />the drain and we determined then that we would put $40,000 <br />a year into base replacement so you can see from 1977 to 1980 <br />how we're increasing. We're now double what we were three <br />years ago in base replacement. The cost of asphalt and that <br />type of things are going sky high. We could have given <br />streets to the people allover the city for $7.20 in 1976, and <br />I think we could have held that had we started in 1977. <br />Granted this is $98.10 a foot for 36 feet, and if you cut it <br />to 32 feet you could cut some, but you can see if we go <br />another four years - supposing we take the MSA rating off <br />and do it as a residential street, I would dare say we're <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.