My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0131
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2011 11:49:13 AM
Creation date
3/21/2011 11:49:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/31/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Work Plan Meeting 1 <br /> Monday,January 31,2011 <br /> Page 6 <br /> the entire campus is on the system; existing and expanded geothermal fields and <br /> potential for additional wells needed; land long term leases versus city ownership <br /> of park properties and related advantages/disadvantages and any financial bene- <br /> fits, similar to estate planning, for property owners and/or the City itself. <br /> Additional discussion included status of the tree survey for city-owned trees; sta- <br /> tus of playground equipment and anticipated lifespan and replacement schedules <br /> and cost-sharing between the City and area parks support groups; asset mainten- <br /> ance program indications within the department; ongoing underfunding of the <br /> Parks Improvement Program (PIP) fund; development of a volunteer program and <br /> adequate supervision and direction; and recognition of the need to maintain exist- <br /> ing parks and facilities before adding more, or factoring their long-term mainten- <br /> ance into their initial cost. <br /> Additional discussion included the status of the Master Plan implementation sur- <br /> vey and any potential referendum; development of a Maintenance Trust Fund <br /> similar to the City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) to generate funds for on- <br /> going maintenance of park equipment and facilities and in tune with asset man- <br /> agement perspectives. <br /> Councilmember Pust asked that staff ensure that the survey questions are shaped <br /> in a way that gives a clear understanding that the City Council may need to in- <br /> crease taxes for other programs/services during the same timeframe a referendum <br /> for implementing the Parks Master Plan initiatives is undertaken. <br /> d. Fire Department—Fire Chief Tim O'Neill <br /> Fire Chief Tim reviewed the Department's "Must Do's" and "Ought to do's" in <br /> 2011, including mandated and regularly scheduled activities or those already in <br /> process. Chief O'Neill elaborated on those items provided in staff's written dis- <br /> cussion outline. <br /> Significant discussion among Councilmembers and staff included the existing and <br /> projected building needs, currently being finalized by the Building Needs Facility <br /> Committee and prepared for recommendation to the City Council in the near fu- <br /> ture. Discussion included past needs and those of the next 30-40 years; changes <br /> in the department and services provided to the community; equipment changes <br /> and reductions in the fleet over the last five (5) years; capital equipment funding <br /> needs anticipated in the next 5-8 years, including radios, which were previously <br /> replaced with assistance from grant funds; and recommended staffing changes and <br /> restructuring similar to that addressed by the Police Department as service needs <br /> and training requirements changed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.