Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 28, 2011 <br /> Page 23 <br /> Councilmembers Pust and McGehee concurred that the list of programs was ac- <br /> ceptable. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the individual items listed and process was <br /> similar to that used prior to the 2008/2009 budget process. <br /> City Manager Malinen clarified that it did not include the specificity of programs <br /> being funded. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred, noting that while a Police Patrol Category was shown, it <br /> was now broken down into more specific components. <br /> City Manager Malinen sought to confirm that the City Council was interested in a <br /> priority-based approach, not a programmatic approach. <br /> Councilmember Pust, referencing Attachment A and the anatomy of priority- <br /> based budgeting, says the first step demands a discussion on an established levy <br /> amount, at which point the list could be prioritized; however, she opined that this <br /> was not what had been done to-date. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that it was his personal intent to have the levy level discussion <br /> early in the process; since that is the intended design of priority-based budgeting <br /> process. At the request of Councilmember Pust, Mayor Roe advised that it was <br /> his intent, as indicated on the proposed budget calendar, to first have the City <br /> Manager present a recommended budget in a vacuum and in general terms based <br /> on the list of programs in Attachment B and showing what was needed to fund <br /> those programs, with the City Council then providing further refinement and their <br /> preferred levy level, and staff returning to the City Council with a budget based <br /> on that levy level and its related implications. <br /> Councilmember Pust disagreed, opining that the first step should be setting the <br /> levy level. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that it had been the mutual conclusion of he and City Manag- <br /> er Malinen and Finance Director Miller that the levy needed to be set and the City <br /> Manager recommendation would proceed on the basis of that; however, there was <br /> a need to have the prioritization exercise done so staff was aware of City Council <br /> priorities to allow them to determine what could or could not be funded, which <br /> would need to be reduced, and which could be funded. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that it should be both a qualitative and quantitative <br /> issue, with prioritization saying the levy was established at a certain level. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that prioritization tells you what it should be, and the various <br /> programs that can be funded by funding sources available. <br />