Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 21,2011 <br /> Page 21 <br /> Mr. Peterson reviewed the area in question on private property and appearing to <br /> be a gap. Mr. Peterson referenced staff's Condition 7.b regarding limiting fences <br /> to preserve the integrity of the storm water treatment areas; and the developer <br /> suggesting one deviation along Lexington Avenue to bridge that gap and avoid <br /> access of the public onto private property by installing a fence across that ease- <br /> ment area, to be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association, with <br /> the understanding that it could be removed or replace in order to repair the pipe, at <br /> the Homeowner Association's expense. Mr. Peterson opined that this would al- <br /> low continuity as well with the proposed four foot (4') fence and retaining wall <br /> along Lots 9, 10 and 11; and agreed that no stone columns would be installed on <br /> that easement. <br /> Discussion among City Councilmembers and Mr. Peterson included the extensive <br /> drop-off on the western elevation along County Road C-2 and their intent to ad- <br /> dress that grade through with level driveways off County Road C-2 and walk-out <br /> home designs for those lots, in addition to fill; removal of the existing billboard <br /> on the northeast corner of the property as part of the purchase transaction, with <br /> the advertiser already given notice for removal, pending City action on the Final <br /> Plat and subsequent land purchase; and aesthetics of the proposed four foot (4') <br /> fence and its common theme rather than each individual homeowner having their <br /> own choice of fence. <br /> Further discussion included proposed property covenants and timing for their ad- <br /> ministration with the Association based on occupancy levels and addressing inte- <br /> rior and exterior requirements; and targeted price ranges for the six (6) different <br /> options and floor plans at approximately$430,000. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Written comment via e-mail was received from Jeffrey Strobeck, 1297 West <br /> County Road C-2 (opposed to opening County Road C-2); Gerald McDonald, <br /> 2857 Dellwood Avenue (opposed to opening County Road C-2); Scott Cum- <br /> mings, 1175 Josephine Road (in support of opening County Road C-2); Richard <br /> Skaggs, 1160 Josephine Road (comments related to drainage infrastructure) were <br /> provided by staff as bench handouts, attached hereto and made a part hereof <br /> Pam Newcome, 1245 Josephine Road <br /> Ms. Newcome noted her attendance at the March Planning Commission meeting <br /> and the robust discussion held on whether or not to open County Road C-2; and <br /> subsequent advisement by the Commission that County Road C-2 would not be <br /> part of the discussion of this development, but was a separate issue. Ms. New- <br /> come expressed her frustration that the Traffic Study was not available on the <br /> City's website. <br /> Ms. Newcome questioned the traffic study's methodology of current observation <br /> predicting future use; questioned traffic patterns and possible alternative routes <br />