My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-04-22_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-04-22_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:01:09 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 12:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 Ayes: 4 <br />3 Nays: 0 <br />4 Motion carried. <br />5 <br />6 Discussion included the immediate need for staff of the Cities of Shoreview and Roseville to <br />7 know budget requirements as they prepared their budget work papers over the next few months. <br />8 <br />9 Mr. Schwartz advised that he would check on the availability of a meeting room, and advise <br />10 members accordingly. <br />11 <br />12 Ms. Lewis left the meeting at this time; approximately 7:12 p.m. <br />13 <br />14 Discussion: 2011 Budget /Work Plan Chair Ferrington <br />15 Chair Ferrington suggested tabling this item to the Special Business meeting on May 27, 2010. <br />16 <br />17 Chair Ferrington moved, Member Manzara seconded tabling this item to the Special Meeting <br />18 scheduled on May 27, 2010. <br />19 <br />20 Ayes: 4 <br />21 Nays: 0 <br />22 Motion carried. <br />23 <br />24 Action Item: Conservation Practice BMP Account/Roll -Over Fund Policy <br />25 Mr. Petersen provided, as a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part thereof <br />26 recommendations to the GLWMO for a policy discussion for the BMP cost -share program; <br />27 suggesting that the funding be moved out of the fund balance and dedicated to a special fund. <br />28 <br />29 Member Eckman moved, Member Manzara seconded that funds remain in a dedicated line item <br />30 until spent on BMP projects. <br />31 <br />32 Ayes: 4 <br />33 Nays: 0 <br />34 Motion carried. <br />35 <br />36 Mr. Schwartz suggested, in light of earlier discussions with the timeline for a work plan <br />37 unknown at this time, and that the fund balance would be moved without knowing what it would <br />38 actually cost to accomplish. <br />39 <br />40 Further discussion ensued related to recommendations and items detailed in the April 20, 2010 <br />41 bench handout. <br />42 <br />43 Member Eckman suggested that a record be kept from year to year to earmark that allotment <br />44 through the years. <br />45 <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.