Laserfiche WebLink
1 Additional discussion included the need for transparency of those funds and possible later budget <br />2 adjustments as applicable; and the context of applying the funds retroactively, rather than <br />3 proactively at the end of a budget year. <br />4 <br />5 Member Eckman moved, Member Manzara seconded that cost sharing be proactively included <br />6 as part of the annual operation budget, with the separate line item struck out of the Capital <br />7 Improvement Budget effective with the 2011 Budget. <br />8 <br />9 Ayes: 4 <br />10 Nays: 0 <br />11 Motion carried. <br />12 <br />13 City of Roseville Appointment Update <br />14 Mr. Schwartz advised that the vacancy on the GLWMO had been advertised and the application <br />15 period would close on May 10, 2010, with no candidates to -date, and asking that individual <br />16 Board members spread the word to any interested citizens. Mr. Schwartz anticipated <br />17 appointment by the Roseville City Council of a Roseville resident to the GLWMO if someone <br />18 made application by then. <br />19 <br />20 Appointment of Alternate Chair <br />21 Member Westerberg moved, Chair Ferrington seconded nominated Member Manzara as <br />22 Alternate Chair to replace former Member Jeff Boldt, who resigned at the end of the previous <br />23 meeting. <br />24 <br />25 Member Manzara accepted the nomination. <br />26 <br />27 Ayes: 4 <br />28 Nays: 0 <br />29 Motion carried. <br />30 <br />31 Ad hoc Technical Support Committees <br />32 Member Manzara presented two (2) bench handouts, respectively entitled, "Ad Hoc Committee <br />33 Concepts for GLWMO;" attached hereto and made a part thereof. Member Manzara reviewed <br />34 the proposed concepts in the context of previously- discussed organizational changes, and <br />35 provided thoughts on the process for subcommittees, based on clear direction of the GLWMO <br />36 and its vision; and whether those ad hoc committees would be to pursue a single item or would <br />37 be a standing committee, advisory or working groups, and how the GLWMO Board could best <br />38 utilize those options and their specific functions, and the specific skill set of members in <br />39 providing technical, legal or contractual support; and whether such ad hoc committees be formed <br />40 from outside the GLWMO Board members themselves based on various parameters set out by <br />41 the GLWMO Board itself. <br />42 <br />43 Various examples were discussed; potential committees (i.e., public relations, education, legal, <br />44 consultants); and whether a Board member should be part of any ad hoc committees for <br />45 communication and logistic purposes. <br />46 <br />11 <br />