Laserfiche WebLink
1 Ms. Stowell offered to draft a sample contract for review of Mr. Schwartz, Mr. Maloney and <br />2 Chair Ferrington, prior to review and consideration of the GLWMO. <br />3 <br />4 Chair Ferrington moved, Member Manzara seconded consideration of approval of a retroactive <br />5 Professional Services Contract, to be drafted and approved by both parties, for Recording <br />6 Secretary services by Sheila Stowell, retroactive from tonight's meeting (April 22, 2010); for <br />7 consideration and action at the upcoming Special Meeting in May. <br />8 <br />9 Ayes: 4 <br />10 Nays: 0 <br />11 Motion carried. <br />12 <br />13 Action Item: Sample Treasurer's Report format Peterson <br />14 Mr. Petersen provided, as a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part thereof, a sample <br />15 2010 Operational Budget for the GLWMO for comment by the membership. <br />16 <br />17 Discussion included documentation provided by Mr. Schwartz; identification of lien items and <br />18 corresponding administrative services with the Ramsey Conservation District; unidentified <br />19 services and expenses based on documentation from November of 2009; listed fund balances and <br />20 those funds not apparently reserved for budget items; cash balances; BMP projects cost sharing; <br />21 transfers from fund balances into specific line items for budget adjustments. <br />22 <br />23 Further discussion included historical funds held by the City of Roseville; ease of tracking the <br />24 $50,000 appropriation; need for accounting of grant funds separately for tracking purposes. <br />25 <br />26 Ms. Lewis advised that she would further research how grant funds should be allocated and <br />27 itemized; and offered to provide several samples of budgeting reports from other WMO's /WD's, <br />28 specifically one from Brown's Creek that provides an easy layout. <br />29 <br />30 Member Manzara moved, Chair Ferrington seconded that Mr. Petersen review forwarded <br />31 information from Ms. Lewis based on the Brown's Creek Watershed District model; and that he <br />32 provide an edited, revised document, for consideration and action at the next meeting. <br />33 <br />34 Ayes 4 <br />35 Nays: 0 <br />36 Motion carried. <br />37 <br />38 Members concurred that the basic draft format was acceptable; and corporately expressed <br />39 appreciation to Mr. Petersen for his work and submission of the draft document. <br />40 <br />41 Member Eckman requested that Mr. Petersen provide the document converted to a one -page <br />42 format. <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />7 <br />