Laserfiche WebLink
Member Westerberg clarified that he was not interested in challenging the Agreement at all and <br />was not advocating holding up the contract, but simply wished to address his concerns. <br />Chair Ferrington advised that EOR should be made aware of this Board concern, and work with <br />them closely as the plan develops. <br />Member Manzara also noted the need to reiterate to them an emphasis in keeping clear <br />communication with staff from representative cities, as expressed by Mr. Maloney. <br />Mr. Maloney advised that clarity will assist him in meeting their schedule and keeping the <br />overall GLWMO Board and plan development schedule on track as well, allowing him to be <br />aware of the information needs of EOR to manage his resources accordingly. Mr. Maloney <br />advised that he had held discussions with EOR representatives in the past and felt comfortable <br />with their expectations and their standard operating procedures in recognizing communication <br />needs of representative cities based on limited staff resources. <br />Member Eckman announced that she needed to leave tonight's meeting by 6:30 p.m. due to a <br />scheduling conflict with another meeting; however, she spoke in support of the EOR Agreement <br />with the GLWMO Board as revised and presented tonight. <br />Meeting Schedule for 2011 <br />As part of the timeline for Plan development, Chair Ferrington noted that he and Mr. Petersen, <br />formerly with the RCD, had held extensive discussion about professional service needs for 2011, <br />similar to those currently provided by the RCD. Chair Ferrington advised that he had not yet held <br />similar detailed discussions with Mr. Goodnature, now representing the RCD. However, Chair <br />Ferrington expressed confidence in Mr. Goodnature's understanding of the tasks and <br />accomplishments facing the GLWMO over the next year. <br />Chair Ferrington suggested that the Board consider meeting on a monthly basis for 2011, noting <br />that both proposals from Mr. Petersen and the RCD included provisions for twelve (12) <br />meetings, allowing the GLWMO to remain within their 2011 budget. Chair Ferrington noted the <br />need to provide updated information on meeting frequency, if approved tonight, on the website. <br />While recognizing the required time commitment, by consensus, members were supportive of <br />meeting monthly in 2011 to facilitate timely development of the Third Generation Plan. <br />Member Westerberg advised that he couldn't commit to making many meetings, depending on <br />his travel schedule. Member Von De Linde advised that she would be out -of -state and unable to <br />addend a February meeting. Member Manzara also expressed there could be some potential <br />conflicts with monthly meetings but agreed to their importance. <br />Mr. Maloney advised that monthly meetings could pose a problem; however he committed to his <br />attendance, or that of a responsible city representative to the 2011 monthly GLWMO meetings, <br />in accordance with provisions outlined in the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). <br />4 <br />