My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-12-15_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-12-15_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:14:27 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 12:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
688 <br />689 Member Eckman noted her perception that there could be significant additional costs for <br />690 improvement versus maintaining Member Eckman noted the need to recognize culture change <br />691 and encouraging people in their responsibility to protect water bodies and to provide a <br />692 sustainability definition in the framework for future generations. <br />693 <br />694 Chair Ferrington noted the need for differences in management based on specific conditions of a <br />695 water body, indicating that there may be those with current water quality appropriate for <br />696 maintenance and those more appropriate to manage for improvement of water quality into the <br />697 future; and how each element of a Mission statement may apply or not apply to a specific body <br />698 of water. <br />699 <br />700 Member Manzara opined that restoration was really subjective; questioning at which point in <br />701 time a water body should be restored to; further opining that it was only as meaningful as your <br />702 action. <br />703 <br />704 Ms. Correll advised that she would take tonight's discussion, and the submission of individual <br />705 words from Board Members to define and draft a Mission and Vision that could be further <br />706 developed for floating at the first stakeholder meeting. <br />707 <br />708 Next Steps <br />709 Ms. Correll asked that the Board set a date for the first stakeholder meeting, anticipating that the <br />710 meeting would be held in Open House format from 3:30 6:30 p.m., allowing Board members to <br />711 interface with those individuals and agencies attending. <br />712 <br />713 Member Westerberg advised that he anticipated being out of town the entire month of January. <br />714 <br />715 Ms. Correll advised that she would arrange to meet with Members Westerberg and Manzara <br />716 prior to his leaving town to discuss water quality data. <br />717 <br />718 Discussion included location logistics; commitment of Board members and their availability to <br />719 attend all meetings for the duration of 2011; EOR goals for the first stakeholder meeting; review <br />720 by EOR of as much data as possible related to each water body, summaries of existing data and <br />721 discussion of outlet structures, quality of existing resources, and discussion with Member <br />722 Westerberg of the Barr Report; and subsequent stakeholder meetings. <br />723 <br />724 Member Manzara suggested that if the first stakeholder meeting was held in Roseville, the <br />725 second one be held in Shoreview. <br />726 <br />727 Ms. Bloom and Mr. Maloney advised that the sooner the next meeting date was available the <br />728 better in planning logistics and meeting room reservations. <br />729 <br />730 Ms. Correll suggested that the second stakeholder meeting be held approximately three weeks <br />731 from the first meeting; and the third meeting held the first part of March; and coordinated with <br />732 upcoming GLWMO Board meeting dates as well for planning purposes. <br />733 <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.