Laserfiche WebLink
93 <br />94 2011 Meeting Schedule <br />95 Discussion ensued regarding individual schedules of members and representatives from member <br />96 cities and availability of dates; consistency of meeting dates and times; preferred role of city staff <br />97 representatives from both Roseville and Shoreview to maintain communication during <br />98 development of the 3rd Generation 10 Year Plan, and for policy and implementation of the plan <br />99 by cities; and the dramatic evolution of WMO administration and interaction with cities over the <br />100 years since the GLWMO's inception. <br />101 <br />102 By consensus, members and city staff representatives concurred that the third Thursday of each <br />103 month at 5:00 p.m. was the preferred date and time for 2011 meetings. <br />104 <br />105 Members requested that Ms. Bloom review the availability of meeting rooms for a two -hour <br />106 block starting in January of 2011 to determine if there were any scheduling conflicts. <br />107 <br />108 Mr. Maloney noted that if the City of Roseville had meeting room conflicts, Shoreview facilities <br />109 may be available as needed. <br />110 <br />111 Member Manzara moved, and Member Eckman seconded approval 2011 meetings on the third <br />112 Thursday of each month at 5:00 p.m. <br />113 <br />114 Ayes: 5 <br />115 Nays: 0 <br />116 Motion carried <br />117 <br />118 Treasurer's Report <br />119 Chair Ferrington advised that this was only an update, and not an action item, as the 2010 <br />120 Treasurer's Annual Report was pending and would be brought forward in the near future. <br />121 <br />122 Mr. Petersen reviewed the GLWMO Treasurer's Statement for the Period ending November 30, <br />123 2010 (version 12.10/10); and Budget Details (version 12/10 /10); highlighting expenditures since <br />124 the last Treasurer's report; noting that the bulk of funds remaining in the General Expense <br />125 Budget will be utilized by year -end. <br />126 <br />127 Mr. Petersen reviewed the Non Encumbered Fund Balance; remaining projects and general <br />128 expenses anticipated before year -end; and carryover for 2011 in addition to 2011 budget <br />129 revenues from the Cities of Shoreview and Roseville. <br />130 <br />131 Members concurred that they would like to have additional detail for the 2011 Budget indicating <br />132 how the totals had been derived. <br />133 <br />134 Chair Ferrington asked that the spreadsheets include formulas guiding and demonstrating how <br />135 money was moved around from one reporting period to the next. <br />136 <br />137 Mr. Petersen advised that this could be done for future reports. <br />138 <br />3 <br />