My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7072
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:35 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7072
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-80-26 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/17/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />As far as the people across the street, I can't see them wanting <br />to go for it at 100%. It just doesn't seem fair. Our impression <br />was that whenever a new development went in that the fellow who sold <br />it had to pay for the improvements on it and they were supposed to <br />be in before the people moved in so we feel the people are <br />getting kind of a shaft there. <br /> <br />The map doesn't picture it (inaudible) there is quite a jog <br />there. The third house across the street from us - a week ago <br />Saturday night had a bunch of people there for" a party. I came <br />down Lovell and there were a bunch of cars here and there, and <br />one car pulled out in front of me. I had no where to go. I did <br />jam on the brakes and got out of his way but because of the <br />narrowness of the street it was a close one. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: You're generally in favor of the project but <br />have concern about the assessment for some of the people. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else on this proposal? Anyone else <br />to be heard? If not, I will close the hearing. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: I would like to ask Mr. Popovich a <br />Is there some way, Mr. popovich, that these people can be <br />more equitable assessment posture than what is here now. <br />are our options? <br /> <br />question. <br />assured a <br />What <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: You make a decision on assessments a year from <br />now. If you want to privately tell them how you're going to feel <br />that's your prerogative, but you can't bind the rest of the Council <br />and it may be that all of us won't be here a year from now so that's <br />one of the problems. Legally, we're here on the feasibility, <br />but you don't make assessment decisions tonight. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: It's very interesting the people that come up <br />and make comments. They're very much concerned about their <br />neighbors and I think that's very nice of them to be concerned <br />about their neighbors, and it appears as though the majority of the <br />people are in favor of the improvement. I just wanted to know what <br />our options were. <br /> <br />~~YOR DEMOS: Do you care to make a commitment? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: Not publicly at this time. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: As this moves along, the City staff can look at <br />it and maybe something can be worked out. Obviously we don't want <br />this to happen in the future so perhaps something can be worked out <br />with the subdivider on the remaining lots. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: <br />feel and what we want to <br />not safe and it's better <br />developed. <br /> <br />I think the people in favor know how we <br />do, but by the same token the street is <br />to do it now than wait until you're more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.