My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-03-17_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-03-17_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:29:47 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 12:26:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/17/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2010/2011 GLWMO BMP Cost -share Program <br />Ryan Johnson, Ramsey Conservation District (RCD): <br />Mr. Johnson provided a review and highlights of the 2010 program, and presented some changes <br />for the program in 2011. Mr. Petersen noted that the GLWMO Board needed to consider action <br />on a revised Professional Services Agreement with the RCD for the 2011 progra including the <br />proposed changes to the program. Discussion during the 2010 program re presentation <br />included: forms available on the website for BMP projects; the need to rea ge the website for <br />easier public access to information regarding the program. It was sugges t our educational <br />information regarding the cost -share program include information of rat shosphorous to <br />algae in water resources as a way to reinforce the need to mama: w stormw t source <br />before it can flow to our lakes; the 5 -year maintenance require is for this fu a was also <br />reviewed. Mr. Johnson advised that it was his intent to make ailable more free °nt reports to <br />the GLWMO Board in 2011. Mr. Johnson emphasized th° i eed fo e GLWMO website to be <br />updated and provide easier public access from the ho e. °re was discussion regarding <br />suggested changes to the program for 2011. It was sug_eA hair Pro -tem Eckman, that the <br />GLWMO cost -share program be advertized at an upcoming 1a t Expo and Market event <br />that she is part of.. There was further discussion regarding prints m `Post card" about the cost <br />share program, which should include a map g the GLWMO too arses. Further discussion was <br />directed at target projects to be reported to B R_ o know as soon as possible how <br />BWSR plans to allocate grant funds in the dOxt grad" Mr. Petersen suggested GLWMO <br />sponsorship of a public workshop(s) for Lake' Owa °so, Wabasso Lake and Snail Lake <br />homeowners to prepare for a future BWSR grit and develop interest in the cost -share program <br />for 2011. Mr. Petersen soughtauthorizatiTy the Board to direct him to work with Mr. <br />Johnson to focus on this speak ideas. An early spring workshop(s) was determined to be most <br />appropriate. Ms. Correll sggestei hat it might be appropriate to give a Watershed District tours <br />and visit past shoreline r torati site provide examples of possible projects. Mr. Johnson <br />advised that the RED 11ieved good success and attendance at workshops in the past, <br />including attendance by th and County /city officials. Ms. Correll suggested that a <br />condition of fundin"`rou h the BMP program be that the project site becomes g P g p j <br />available `ours an educational information to others. <br />Further scussion inc -d location and availability of DNR signs indicating lakeshore habitat <br />rest activities. Johnson suggested raising cost sharing funding caps for 2011 from <br />$1, 0 500 for ,'.licable shoreline projects. Mr. Johnson also suggested that consideration <br />be given y rea g the caps for rain garden funding as well. He suggested that amount be <br />increased fr: I0 to $1,000. Mr. Petersen provided an update of funds rolled over from 2010 <br />for BMP cod 'share projects with over $11,000 currently available in cost -share funds. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the components applicable for cost -share funds currently (plant <br />installation, not retaining walls or labor) and a cap on total material costs (50% of total material <br />costs); and whether to consider changing from cost -share on only material to include total project <br />costs. Mr. Johnson advised that the typical cost for a rain garden was $600 $800; and that <br />excessive costs were usually not an issue. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.