My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-03-17_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-03-17_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 12:29:47 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 12:26:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/17/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
93 <br />94 <br />95 <br />96 <br />97 <br />98 <br />99 <br />100 <br />101 <br />102 <br />103 <br />104 <br />105 <br />106 <br />107 <br />108 <br />109 <br />110 <br />111 <br />112 <br />113 <br />114 <br />115 <br />116 <br />117 <br />118 <br />119 <br />120 <br />121 <br />122 <br />123 <br />124 <br />125 <br />126 <br />127 <br />128 <br />129 <br />130 <br />131 <br />132 <br />133 <br />134 <br />135 <br />136 <br />137 <br />138 <br />Mr. Petersen sought clarification on the type of BMP's the GLWMO wanted to target, and if <br />shoreline restoration, suggested a higher cap at $2,500 and less of a cap of $1,000 for rain garden <br />installations, but both higher than currently allotted. Member Miller expressed his support for <br />raising both caps and prioritizing shoreline management. <br />Motion 11 -02 -02 <br />Member Miller moved, and Member Westerberg seconded revising the BMP cost -share program <br />from fifty percent (50 materials to fifty percent (50 total project cost; limiti in -kind labor <br />at $10 per hour; and capping total participation of GLWMO funds at $1,01 rain garden <br />installations and $2,500 for shoreline restoration projects. <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />TMDL Studies and Retro -fit Anal sis of stormwater S ste <br />Mr. Johnson continued his presentation with discussion <br />relation to TMDL requirements. It was noted that the P <br />study funding with a response anticipated within several m <br />building on the April 2009 Barr Eng. Study of Lake Owasso <br />Analysis Study" by doing a targeted study of those sub-wa <br />as sources of phosphorous; creating <cp projects with the City of Roseville and <br />the RCD such as the street reconstruction projects thlitt were submitted for funding in 2011 (i.e., <br />the Dale Street project). <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: <br />Mot' <br />2011 Professional Services Agreement between: heGLWMO and the RCD <br />3 <br />er system retrofits studies in <br />received our request for TMDL <br />F her discussion included <br />Owasso Use Attainability <br />atheds that had already been <br />Motion 11-02-03 <br />Member Westerberg d and 1 1 or:Miller seconded authorizing the Chair Pro -tem to sign <br />a contract with the R m v arri`onservation District (RCD) for technical services for 2011 with <br />payments made quarterly and tt tal annual costs not to exceed $6,500. <br />At the su n r. Petersen, it was the Board's consensus that the current pending project <br />as identifie s uded under revised cost -share caps. <br />As a follow -up to a past cost -share project that was constructed (by the RCD, Prince of Peace <br />church, and the City of Roseville) within GLWMO, Chair Pro -tem Eckman requested that RCD <br />follow -up with Prince of Peace Church to complete the repairs that were identified in 2010. The <br />quality of Bennett Lake is affected by this project. Mr. Johnson noted that in past meeting <br />minutes, reference had been made to current correspondence, suggesting that more Action item <br />"user friendly" /enthusiastic letters needed to be created by Mr. Johnson. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.