2011-01-20_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

318 Chair Pro -tem Eckman noted that, even though FOR needed to acquire and pay for a 319 two -year license from the DNR to use their database, they had absorbed that cost. 320 321 e) Review of January 12 Stakeholders' meeting and date for March Stakeholders' 322 meeting 323 Chair Pro -tem Eckman referenced the one -page meeting summary from the January 324 12, 2011 Stakeholder Meeting as provided by Ms. Correll; noting that she had 325 additional information and pictures available for Mr. Petersen to include on the 326 GLWMO Board's website to hopefully encourage other members of the public to 327 attend to provide their comments. 328 329 Chair Pro -tem Eckman distributed sample feedback forms to individual Board 330 members to copy and distribute to interested citizens; and suggested more personal e- 331 mail invitations from individual Board members to send those they think may attend. 332 Third Stakeholder Meeting: 333 Discussion ensued on the proposed date (March 10, 2011) for the third Stakeholder 334 meeting; proposed location in Shoreview; and proposed format for that meeting, 335 anticipating a presentation; and the need to develop an agenda for the meeting to 336 include on the website. 337 338 Member Von De Linde suggested that the February 10, 2011 meeting be called an 339 open house but that the March 10, 2011 meeting have a specific time for presentation. 340 Chair Pro -tem Eckman concurred with those suggestions. 341 Member Von De Linde advised that she showed the tentative schedule for March 10, 342 2010 from 3:30 6:30 p.m.; and following additional discussion, Mr. Schwartz 343 suggested holding it later, such as at 5:00 p.m., to facilitate those interested in 344 attending, but coming from work. 345 Mr. Petersen asked that the subcommittee consult with Ms. Correll and advise him of 346 the time at their earliest convenience for posting on the Board's website. 347 Member Von De Linde referenced summary notes from the January 12, 2011 348 meeting, noting the need for stakeholder representatives of Snail Lake and Lake Judy. 349 ACTION: 350 Chair Pro -tem Eckman asked Member Von De Linde to include these topics for 351 discussion with Ms. Correll at their upcoming meeting with her to determine the 352 specific times and agenda for the third stakeholder meeting. 353 354 f) Other Plan related discussions 355 Mr. Schwartz noted the need to come up with a regulatory framework for the Plan as 356 part of the process, including goals and performance standards. 357 358 Chair Pro -tem Eckman noted that it had not come up yet, but consideration should be 359 given to when it should occur; and further noted that Member Westerberg, and former 360 Member Ferrington as a private citizen be tasked to work as a Technical Advisory 361 subcommittee. Chair Pro -tem Eckman noted the need for review of neighboring 362 watershed organizations to make sure the Third Generation Plan did not have adverse 363 impacts on representative cities by requiring them to adhere to dissimilar rules Chair 8