Laserfiche WebLink
275 Action step <br />276 Chair Pro Tem Eckman advised that the Board would wait to see what happened with the TMDL <br />277 before moving further on South Owasso discharge into the Lake. Ms. Correll suggested that a <br />278 cost implementation plan be included in the Third Generation Plan related for determination at a <br />279 later date as to the type of monitoring efforts, upon completion of the Plan in early summer prior <br />280 to the review period to be completed in 2012, if not 2011, depending on budget and to determine <br />281 whether the DNR will have any funding available. <br />282 <br />283 BMP Cost -Share Program Policy Change <br />284 Mr. Petersen advised that, following February's Board meeting with Mr. Johnson from the RCD, <br />285 he had made revisions to the cost -share agreement changing the program title and provisions. In <br />286 addition to those changes, Chair Pro Tem Eckman had suggested an additional provision in the <br />287 cost -share agreement requiring recipients to allow the GLWMO Board to allow access to the <br />288 site, with proper advance notice, for education and maintenance inspection purposes. Discussion <br />289 of including this provision included the similarity of it to requirements of other watershed <br />290 districts; the need to use completed projects as an educational and informational item for the <br />291 community as well as other property owners; acknowledging that since public monies were <br />292 being used as an incentive for the project, it was fair to share those projects for further education <br />293 and awareness of the possibilities; recognizing the need to limit and manage public access onto <br />294 private property, with notice language suggested as "reasonable and pre approved" for <br />295 clarification; and final consensus among Board members that "reasonable" was sufficient <br />296 language unless additional language was indicated after practical use. Additional discussion <br />297 included the policy stating that projects would be monitored on an annual basis during the term <br />298 of the five (5) year maintenance period, and requirements that the Board reserved the right to <br />299 seek restitution of funds if the property owner did not follow -up with their maintenance portion <br />300 of the contract. The Board discussed the benefit of annual inspections for the property owner and <br />301 the RCD to address problem areas in the early stages. Mr. Petersen discussed another process <br />302 change in the cost -share program where the Board now approves all projects rather that the RCD <br />303 staff approving projects. Mr. Petersen advised that the only pending project that would be <br />304 affected by these changes to the program is the Nate Arthur rain garden project on Fisk Street in <br />305 Roseville, scheduled for completion on May 18, 2011. Mr. Petersen noted that the project may <br />306 need the Board's authorization for extension at the April meeting, depending on weather <br />307 conditions; and further noted that, based on discussions at the February GLWMO Board <br />308 meeting, Mr. Johnson had advised Mr. Arthur of the increase in cost -share dollars available, if <br />309 they accepted additional language regarding access for educational purposes. <br />310 <br />311 Motion 11 -03 -11 <br />312 Member Von De Linde moved, and Member Miller seconded, approval of additional Item #5 to <br />313 the draft policy agreement for BMP cost -share program as follows: <br />314 "The property owner shall grant the GLWMO reasonable access to the conservation <br />315 practice site for the purpose of project inspection and environmental education and <br />316 demonstration events." <br />317 Ayes: 4 <br />318 Nays: 0 <br />319 Motion carried. <br />320 <br />7 <br />