My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7092
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:47 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7092
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-80-22 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
1/26/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Quickly to go through it, the proposal would be to construct <br />several storm drainage facilities. The first, in Area A, being <br />from the intersection of Simpson and Brenner, collecting the <br />water at that intersection and the other intersections along <br />there and going west, constructing a new pipe to replace a very <br />small eight inch pipe that exists in the swale adjacent to <br />Snelling Avenue, and then ultimately putting it into a 24 inch <br />pipe that continues to the north. Area B would be to collect the <br />water along Clarmar and along Hamline and put it into an existing <br />24 inch pipe controlled by the County that goes to Lake Josephine. <br />Area C would be to collect the water at the intersection of Pascal <br />and Brenner, take it along to the cul-de-sac where severe flooding <br />is frequent every spring, and then to a new pipe that has been <br />built in conjunction with the Rice Creek Watershed, which carries <br />that water all the way across Lexington Avenue to Little Josephine <br />where it is filtered. A similar occurrence happens to the water <br />on Lydiaigoing over to Hamline, another piece on Millwood that <br />goes over to Hamline, and a short stretch just on the east side <br />of Hamline, south of that new pipe I just mentioned built by the <br />Rice Creek Watershed. The remaining portion would be to collect <br />the drainage along Lydia from Simpson, Arona and Asbury, including <br />some small lines going about half way up those last two streets <br />and also in the frontage road itself. That would tie into an <br />existing 24 inch line that goes under Snelling and to the new <br />pond that's been built over in the Northwestern College area. <br /> <br />We are still discussing with the County some potential <br />improvements that could be done to work on that water (inaudible) <br />prior to it going into Lake Josephine. We've been discussing it <br />with the lake engineer and, at this point, we do not have a <br />specific determination because we want to review all the various <br />alternatives that are available if this project passes. Briefly <br />stated, the reason for this project is several-fold, including <br />standing water along several intersections which are a detriment <br />both to the pavements and to the travelling public, extensive <br />standing water that occurs on the cul-de-sac repeatedly, standing <br />water in the area of this last home in Section F, and other <br />miscellaneous water problems that are occurring, although not <br />extensively. As I say, rather than going into considerable <br />detail at this point, I feel that it would be time well spent if <br />we could go on with the hearing and answer any questions you have. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, the remarks <br />I'm going to make tonight are in addition to those that were made <br />at the informational hearing on November 20. This project was <br />initiated by the Council (inaudible). The total published cost <br />is $646,625.70. That includes the Lydia Avenue repair. If it <br />was all assessed at the 100% assessment rate, it would come out <br />to $2,222.08 per unit, or per lot. The staff is recommending <br />that the assessment be at 25% as a unit cost, or $555.52 per <br />unit. This would raise $161,656.32. The balance of the total <br />cost is to be spread on general taxes or by M.S.A. funds. As in <br />the past, the assessment hearing would occur roughly a year after <br />the project is done and we would propose, based on the current <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.