My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7092
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:47 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7092
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-80-22 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
1/26/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAYOR DEMOS: I might add (inaudible) not be proper for us <br />to come up with a design for that type (inaudible) unless the <br />project is approved. Because if we would do this now, and deny <br />the project, we have wasted engineering time and money and we <br />cannot charge it off, where it would be charged to the project <br />if it were approved. <br /> <br />MR. ROY ABRAHAMSON, 3089 North Hamline: May I add one <br />factor from the standpoint of Hamline Avenue, again in line with <br />Mr. Jonas's comments. The ditch in front of my property serves <br />as a settling pond and filtration unit during these periods of <br />heavy rains. As evidence of that, I can tell you point blank that <br />the level of the bottom of that ditch has gradually increased over, <br />or raised over the period of the last ten y~ars and that the water <br />actually settles in front of the house there. It has been no <br />serious or significant problem. I feel that it's more important <br />to put up with this minor problem of standing water rather than <br />contaminating a valuable asset, like Lake Josephine. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: <br />you, Mr. Honchell. In <br />there, that would have <br />east side of Hamline. <br /> <br />I would like to direct another question to <br />the development of a weir that's going in <br />to go, I believe, as you indicated, on the <br />Is that correct? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: That's our expectation. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: Then it would be in the jurisdiction of the <br />County. Is that correct? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: That's our expectation. <br /> <br />MR. JULIAN SCHIFSKY, 3082 North Hamline: In that green <br />stuff up there, put that pencil in that green stuff, that's my <br />property. Nobody has ever said a word about what they're going <br />to do or anything to us. How come? They're just going to go in <br />and go ahead or what's the scoop? I talked to Doc Emmons and <br />nobody ever talked to him about going through there. <br /> <br />MR.-HONCHELL: The pipe is already in place. The pipe is <br />there. <br /> <br />MR. SCHIFSKY: (Inaudible) public and private property. <br />There are no easements or nothing there. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: That's part of what I alluded to before. <br />The County seems to have some question as to what easement rights <br />they do have on that existing pipe. <br /> <br />MR. SCHIFSKY: My experience in Roseville, you put the sewer <br />in about six feet deep in my street, the sanitary sewer, and I <br />don't think they do too good of a job. I'd just as soon not have <br />them monkey around with that ground down there. I don't think <br />they know what they're doing. That's the truth. <br /> <br />MR. WALLACE HERRON, l464 Clarmar: I've lived in Roseville <br />for 25 years. I recognize many people in here (inaudible). I <br />feel that the storm sewer is needed. I don't believe in dumping <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.