Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The existing. road is generally centered on the right-of-way, as <br />would the new section. It is in fair shape on some parts, maybe <br />not quite so good a shape on others. There are several trees <br />along the right-of-way. We are not going to be having to take <br />any of those trees directly as far as them being where the curb <br />and gutter and paving would be. There are a few that have very <br />high root systems and until we actually get there I guess we <br />won't know as to what may be happening to some of their roots. <br />If we can leave the tree, we certainly propose to do that. <br />There are a couple other bushes that would have to be relocated <br />on the project. Most of the driveways are concrete. lVhere we <br />don't match the old driveway with the exact elevation on the <br />new pavement, we would be reconstructing that driveway approach, <br />in many cases back to the right-of-way line; or the property <br />line. That would certainly be a part of the project, part of <br />the cost. We don't anticipate any particular problem with the <br />driveways. The road itself has fairly typical grades and we <br />will probably raise the centerline somewhat so that there can be <br />what we call a crown, or the center of the road being a little <br />higher than the gutters, so the water can run to the side <br />(inaudible) more efficiently. There are a couple of fences <br />that are out in the right-of-way. One particularly at this <br />location that will have to be relocated and, I'm not sure, but <br />there may be a little section of this fence right at this loca- <br />tion (inaudible) but that one can be solved fairly simply. <br />No known base problems, no known particularly bad soil under <br />the roadways to cause unusual problems. To those of you that <br />don't do this every day, I'm sure.this is a very new thing; to <br />those of us who do, this is what I would call a routine re- <br />construction. There are no special problems here that I am <br />aware of. Pascal is probably in a little poorer condition than <br />Clarmar is. Again, the yards along the side would match the <br />road fairly well. There are no driveways and there are no tree <br />problems on Pascal. Again, if this is approved, it may well be <br />considered for improvement with the other projects that <br />ultimately get passed. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, the <br />published cost of this improvement is $130,058.39. If it were <br />100% assessed, it would be $45.32 a front foot. Since this <br />project could very well be combined with Improvement P-80-35, <br />Brenner, which is just to the south, the total cost of this <br />improvement, with Brenner, would be $243,580.49. The estimated <br />front footage, at the rate we would recommend at 25% of the <br />cost, the assessments on both streets would be $13.80 per front <br />foot. The normal things I've said regarding assessment <br />hearings and the interest rate and carrying charge that I said <br />earlier apply to this project as well. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Are there any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There are no statements. <br /> <br />2 <br />