My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7095
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:49 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7095
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-80-20 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
1/26/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />most of the water from Mr. Rihm's property, as well as others, <br />would reach that. We still haven't had the assessment hearing <br />because we don't have the final costs from the County. As a <br />general area basis for the County Road C portion, they will be <br />assessed a fairly small amount for part of that as well. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Is there anyone else that wishes to be heard? <br /> <br />EVELYN ~ARABELLA, 2525 West County Road C: <br />sewer and water connected this summer. I see no <br />for the other on the north end of the property. <br />much opposed to it. Thank you. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I guess I don't understand. <br /> <br />We just had <br />reason to pay <br />We're very <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Which is your property? <br /> <br />MRS. MARABELLA: That narrow strip all the way back. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: That narrow strip, 1300 feet there. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Let me clarify just a little. If any of <br />these improvements go in, other than possibly the storm, we <br />would either be acquiring your parcel entirely or there would <br />be no assessments for your parcel. If we didn't acquire it, <br />the only assessment would be the storm because water runs off <br />your land just like it runs off everybody elses. You would be <br />a part of the storm. You wouldn't be a part of the water <br />assessment, sanitary sewer, paving or anything else. <br /> <br />MRS. MARABELLA: I see. I thought we would be. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The storm se\~er you still would, because the <br />water would be running off. But the rest of it, we would either <br />be acquiring the parcel and building a street on what's now your <br />parcel or you wouldn't be assessed. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: Does this also apply to Mr. Rihm? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: No, because, well, before I say that, yes, <br />if we do not acquire the Marabella property, then the only <br />assessment to Mr. Rihm would be his portion of the storm that <br />is shown in yellow in st. Anthony. Plus maybe some very small <br />things to get the water from his property to (inaudible). <br /> <br />COUNCIL~~N KEHR: What would be the assessment on that? <br />Do you have that at your fingertips? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: $145.25 per unit, which I presume is an acre. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Yes, $145.25 per unit, there would be 117 <br />units, it would be 6.6 or 6.66, one of the two, so if you have <br />ten acres, that would be $66.00, you'd pay half of it. Some- <br />thing in the neighborhood of $30,000 to $34,000 total. Again, <br />that assumes there are going to be some catch basins built in <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.