My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7095
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:49 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7095
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-80-20 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
1/26/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />want to interpret this. But it just isn't going to be economi- <br />cally feasible for us if we have to go into all this assessment. <br />Then we'd better politely back away and find something else. <br />Maybe we should stay where we are because we do own our property <br />there. We have been in that building since 1951. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: 'Mr. Andre, on the Marabella property, <br />what would you have to do? Go through condemnation proceedings? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: (Inaudible) the very first question I asked. <br />We reach a conclusion by negotiations or the project becomes too <br />expensive to fool with. That's why Mr. Honchell said there <br />should be a time limit on the period of negotiation. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: Is there? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Not unless we voted it through. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: That's the point we're at, isn't it? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Not necessarily. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: Well, they already said that they're <br />not interested. So, if we're going to negotiate or whatever. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: That's one route to take (inaudible) whether <br />or not we can negotiate (inaudible). <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: I would assume that it can't be. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I don't think that's necessarily a correct <br />assumption. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: Did I hear her incorrectly? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: They indicated they were opposed to the project. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: (Inaudible) before you ordered it <br />(inaudible) unless we order the improvement. If they want to <br />make that kind of a deal (inaudible). Nothing prevents you <br />from making a deal with them before you order in a project. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: I think the recommendation was to (inaudible) <br />assuming the Council wants to go ahead with the project as it's <br />laid out in the feasibility report to see if it can be done. <br />If not, then we would be reverting to the Alternate B plan. <br /> <br />MR. DON BARRY, Williams Brothers Pipeline: we're the long <br />unheard from one. I just have a couple of questions. As Mr. <br />Honchell indicated, he's had some correspondence from the home <br />office. I guess my only comment is that sometimes the home <br />office and the local office don't always see eye to eye. <br /> <br />MAYOR DENOS: who wins out? <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.