My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7101
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7100
>
res_7101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:50 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7101
Resolution Title
The City of Roseville Officially Requests that no Action be taken by the Metropolitan Council or any of its Agencies for a 90 Day Period Concerning the Reallocation of Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Sanitary Sewer Fees being Paid by the City
Resolution Date Passed
2/9/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COlWCIL <br />OF ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA - HELD February 9, 1981 <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular <br />meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, <br />was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, February 9, <br />1981, at 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mayor Demos, <br />Councilmen Curley, Kehr, Johnson and Franke <br />and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Curley introduced and moved the adoption of <br />the following resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLIITION NO. 7101 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, various suburbs near St. Paul have lakes which <br />periodically overflow downstream to the City of St. Paul; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, St. Paul puts said water into a combined sewer <br />system which they operate; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said flow then goes to the Metropolitan Waste <br />Control Commission Plant and St. Paul is billed on a volumetric <br />basis for such sewage treatment; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission conducted <br />a study of the situation, including alternatives to separate the <br />combined sewers; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this is the preferred action recommended in the <br />report; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this matter is being considered at a meeting on <br />February 12, 1981 concerning the potential actions of transferring <br />the costs for said overflow volume treated as part of St. Paul's <br />combined sewers from St. Paul to the suburbs, rather than separating <br />the combined sewers; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, only St. Paul has the authority to separate their <br />combined sewers; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, transferring costs to the suburbs would be a dis- <br />incentive for St. Paul to ever separate its combined sewers; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, no actions are currently being taken to carry out <br />the preferred solution of separating the combined sewers; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has never been invited to <br />any meeting to resolve how the combined sewers could and should be <br />separated; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.