Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 18, 2011 <br /> Page 5 <br /> j. Receive Drainage Report for 3053 Chatsworth Street Subdivision Update <br /> Johnson moved, Willmus seconded, receipt of the drainage report update for 3053 <br /> Chatsworth Street Subdivision. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; McGehee; Pust; Johnson; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> k. Approve General Purchases and Sale of Surplus Items Exceeding$5,000 <br /> Johnson moved, Willmus seconded, approval of the submitted list of general pur- <br /> chases and contracts for services presented as follows: <br /> Department Vendor Item/Description Amount <br /> Streets Martin Marietta Materials Street seal coating materials $47,000.00 <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; McGehee; Pust; Johnson; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 1. Consider Approving a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Ramsey Wash- <br /> ington Cable Commission <br /> Johnson moved, Willmus seconded, approval of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA- <br /> Attachment A) between the City of Roseville and Ramsey/Washington Cable <br /> Commission for the purposes of providing telephone system support. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; McGehee; Pust; Johnson; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br /> a. Adopt a Resolution Approving Proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) as <br /> a CONDITIONAL USE at 3091 Fairview Avenue (former Consent Item 7.g) <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Malinen briefly summarized the re- <br /> quest as detailed in the Request for Council Action (RCA) dated April 18, 2011; <br /> and additional condition that the dwelling unit would be limited to two (2)people, <br /> as per additional condition, on bench handout, attached hereto and made a part <br /> hereof <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted his previously expressed concerns regarding po- <br /> tential impacts for adjacent neighbors through ADU's as a Conditional Use rather <br /> than as Interim Uses; and reiterated his position in not supporting ADU's as Con- <br /> ditional Uses, following the property, without the ability to periodically review <br /> those uses to ensure their compliance. <br />