Laserfiche WebLink
Cut through traffic on local streets is another problem many Evanston residents place near <br />the top of the list of problems they would like to address. Our City is built on a grid system <br />which provides many parallel routes to the arterial and collector streets which are <br />designated to handle the through traffic. This provision of local street alternatives which <br />are several blocks long and are the same length as parallel segments of the major street <br />system leads to cut through traffic as motorists seek to save a few minutes (or seconds) <br />per trip. The grid system was popular 150 years ago when the street pattern was laid out, <br />but it is very unlikely that it would be used if Evanston were being designed today. Instead, <br />you would probably see more curved streets and "no outlet" sections which prevent through <br />traffic. Trying to retrofit the modern design elements on an old grid street system poses <br />quite a challenge for us today. There are some ways to address this which will be <br />discussed later in this report. <br />To help guide us through a process to reduce speeds and cut through traffic, some basic <br />principles have been adopted. These will help as we work through the process of <br />developing techniques for controlling traffic in neighborhoods. <br />Guiding Principles <br />A. Traffic operations and traffic safety are important and should be addressed <br />to enhance the quality of life, the "livability" of the neighborhoods. <br />Perceptions of traffic problems and measurable traffic characteristics are <br />both important and should be considered as solutions are developed. <br />B. The City will continue to support street classifications which give different <br />weights to the streets which form the roadway system (arterial, collector, and <br />local) and recognizes that not all traffic control measures are appropriate for <br />each type of street. These street classifications are found in the City's <br />Comprehensive General Plan. <br />C. Adequate emergency and service access (for the City, as well as other <br />agencies) is essential and must be maintained. <br />D. The process for each neighborhood should include all who have a stake in <br />how the street system operates (residents, businesses, schools, park users, <br />etc.). <br />E. The agreed -upon system of prioritization should be followed when projects <br />compete for limited funding. <br />F. Where possible, trials of the proposed changes should be undertaken prior <br />to final approval of the funding, especially in the more costly projects. <br />G. The traffic control measure(s) selected should not move traffic to other <br />streets. <br />The Process for Developing a Plan <br />Each neighborhood will follow a similar process to develop a traffic management plan. <br />2 <br />